Hi Axel,
Sorry for my late answer,
On Fri, Mar 30 2018 at 10:19:24 AM, Axel Kielhorn wrote:
> The texinfo still says:
>
> @titlepage
> @title groff
> @subtitle The GNU implementation of @code{troff}
> @subtitle Edition 1.22.3
> @subtitle Autumn 2014
Yeah, I'll change the version and date,
> @a
On Tue 10 Apr 2018 19:26:57 Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> > I don't have a specific name suggestion, and I'm aware that
> > this is a bikeshed, but can I suggest a more explicit variable
> > name? Otherwise the next time some old behaviour needs to be
> > switchably deprecated we're in for some confusi
> I don't have a specific name suggestion, and I'm aware that
> this is a bikeshed, but can I suggest a more explicit variable
> name? Otherwise the next time some old behaviour needs to be
> switchably deprecated we're in for some confusion.
Maybe a descriptive name, for example PDFPIC_NOSPACE?
[See at end ... ]
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 18:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Deri James wrote:
> > To avoid making existing documents render incorrectly I propose to allow
> > the
> > existing behaviour to be selected. Adding this to the NEWS file:-
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Deri James wrote:
> To avoid making existing documents render incorrectly I propose to allow the
> existing behaviour to be selected. Adding this to the NEWS file:-
>
>
> PDFPIC
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, Deri James wrote:
>
> PDFPIC has now been corrected, so the behaviour is the same whether you use
> the postscript or pdf drivers. However, this means that any documents which
> were written using t
Hi Deri,
I agree that altering the default to obtain the old `faulty' behaviour
is a good idea.
> A) Add the line ".nr PDFPIC_LEGACY 1" to the document before the first
> call to .PDFPIC.
>
> B) If it is just a single document which exhibits this behaviour you
> can run groff adding "-rPDFPIC_LEG
On Mon 02 Apr 2018 12:14:03 Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Good afternoon Bernhard,
>
> > > So pdfpic is an extension of pspic. By that you can now even replace
> > > all PSPIC by PDFPIC, nothing gets lost by that.
> >
> > I read this as suggesting that results with -Tps and -Tpdf should be
> > equivale
