Hi Branden,
> > Can't the new delete call the existing one to do the work?
>
> + // In function 'void operator delete(void*, long unsigned int)':
> + // warning: deleting 'void*' is undefined [-Wdelete-incomplete]
> + //delete p;
I mean call the function, not kick off the whole magical proce
At 2017-11-12T17:21:43+, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Branden,
>
> > I have a patch that quiets the sized-deallocation warning, but the
> > most obvious solution (to me) causes a different warning.
>
> That I don't think you give?
> Can't the new delete call the existing one to do the work?
I
Hi Branden,
> I have a patch that quiets the sized-deallocation warning, but the
> most obvious solution (to me) causes a different warning.
That I don't think you give?
Can't the new delete call the existing one to do the work?
Whilst reading
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/tree/src/
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, Gour wrote:
> > Unicode support for groff is pretty solid, so you don't have
> > to worry about that. As for "modern fonts," PostScript Type1,
> > TrueType, and Open Type fonts can all be made available to
> > groff with the install-font.sh script
>
> That I have to test - t
Hi folks,
I'm working on https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?52335 and I've
reached the limit of my knowledge of C++.
The problem is a compiler warning:
src/libs/libgroff/new.cpp:60:6: warning: the program should also define
'void operator delete(void*, long unsigned int)' [-Wsized-deallocat
At 2017-11-12T11:48:33+, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Yes, groff is fast compared to some popular alternatives.
> But if we want to move from batch processing to interactive updating
> whilst editing then we need to keep an eye on slowing things down.
> Modern systems are doing that enough already.
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017 15:42:02 -0500
Peter Schaffter wrote:
> If you don't need gpresent's PAUSE function, it's a fairly simple matter to
> create slide templates with mom
Well, workaround for PAUSE could be to just create more 'slides', e.g. one for
each item...
What about something like LaTeX's
Hi,
Ted wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > Groff is, compared to most other formatting systems, blazing-fast.
...
> > it made two passes through what became a 700-900 page manual
> > (depending on what was included) to produce a PDF in less than 2
> > minutes.
>
> I really agree with Larry! Point well stat
