Hello everybody out there using groff,
It is not long ago since I began using groff for text processing
and I like it a lot.
After having only used the default format for my bibliography,
I would like to adapt the output a bit more to my needs.
Therefore, I included some options between the .R1
John Gardner wrote:
|On 30 May 2016 at 23:20, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> John Gardner wrote:
|>|> I have been convinced that soft hyphen is a control character and
|>|> not something visual,
|>|
|>|Almost correct.
|>|
|>|Soft hyphens *do* describe potential breaking points, but they only
On Mon, 30 May 2016 14:37:00 +0200 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> i wrote:
> |Stephen Berman wrote:
> ||Does groff permit characters besides hyphen-minus (ASCII 45) and soft
> ||hyphen (octal 255) for displaying hyphenation in man pages? I'm asking
> |
> |I have been convinced that soft hyphen
On Mon, 30 May 2016 14:29:30 +0200 stef...@sdaoden.eu (Steffen (Daode)
Nurpmeso) wrote:
> Stephen Berman wrote:
> |Does groff permit characters besides hyphen-minus (ASCII 45) and soft
> |hyphen (octal 255) for displaying hyphenation in man pages? I'm asking
>
> I have been convinced that sof
>
> I am, for one, sure that the HTML standard committee will someday
> manage to add markup for shitty baby napkins. The palms and
> beaches of their happenings seem to promote this direction. ^.^
I, uh, think something might've been lost in translation. :|
On 30 May 2016 at 23:20, Steffen Nur
Hello!
John Gardner wrote:
|> I have been convinced that soft hyphen is a control character and
|> not something visual,
|
|Almost correct.
|
|Soft hyphens *do* describe potential breaking points, but they only become
|visible when surrounding text is broken.
|
|For instance, assume this
>
> I have been convinced that soft hyphen is a control character and
> not something visual,
Almost correct.
Soft hyphens *do* describe potential breaking points, but they only become
visible when surrounding text is broken.
For instance, assume this line had soft-hyphens every 20 characters:
Oh!
i wrote:
|Stephen Berman wrote:
||Does groff permit characters besides hyphen-minus (ASCII 45) and soft
||hyphen (octal 255) for displaying hyphenation in man pages? I'm asking
that finally made me think: Eli Zaretskii is so active on the
Unicode list, why don't you use the Pd character
i wrote:
|Stephen Berman wrote:
||Does groff permit characters besides hyphen-minus (ASCII 45) and soft
||hyphen (octal 255) for displaying hyphenation in man pages? I'm asking
|
|I have been convinced that soft hyphen is a control character and
…assuming you referred to U+00AD when you hav
Stephen Berman wrote:
|Does groff permit characters besides hyphen-minus (ASCII 45) and soft
|hyphen (octal 255) for displaying hyphenation in man pages? I'm asking
I have been convinced that soft hyphen is a control character and
not something visual, it should be used as a «break-indicator»
Does groff permit characters besides hyphen-minus (ASCII 45) and soft
hyphen (octal 255) for displaying hyphenation in man pages? I'm asking
because the Emacs package man.el displays references to other man pages
(e.g. in the SEE ALSO section) as clickable links, but has a bug when
such a referenc
11 matches
Mail list logo
