Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-23 Thread Clarke Echols
On 03/23/2016 09:48 PM, Damian McGuckin wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Steve Izma wrote: You DO know what you are talking about. When I typeset large books, there are some stages, like adjusting track kerning on a page, where I want to see immediate results on my viewer. Viewing is somethin

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-23 Thread Clarke Echols
On 03/23/2016 09:21 PM, Steve Izma wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:25:50PM -0400, Larry Kollar wrote: Subject: Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform I guess I need to re-state the question. I'm quite familiar with groff's speed, including with 1000-page (or larger

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-23 Thread Damian McGuckin
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Steve Izma wrote: I assume that another way of asking this: "is groff multithreaded?" I don't know enough about this kind of programming to answer this by looking at the source code. Not as far as I know. I'm only considering this in a Linux environment (Debian stable, fa

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-23 Thread Steve Izma
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:25:50PM -0400, Larry Kollar wrote: > Subject: Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform > > > I'm wondering how CPU configurations affect groff processing > > speed. > > ... So any non-netbook, five years old or less, will perform > pretty well with

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-23 Thread Larry Kollar
> Steve Izma wrote: > > I'm wondering how CPU configurations affect groff processing > speed. On a 2007 MacBook Pro, groff would produce a 900-page manual with a few graphics in 2-3 minutes. That was two groff runs to get cross-refs right, including index generation, followed by a ps2pdf run.