> Sorry I don't understand what the attachement exactly means.
It's a patch that converts your version of glilypond to something that
works.
> Can I just copy the code on git and replace the code of glilypond.pl
> on my machine with it?
Yes, this works too.
Werner
Werner,
great, thank you very much.
Sorry I don't understand what the attachement exactly means.
Can I just copy the code on git and replace the code of glilypond.pl on
my machine with it?
Grégoire
Le vendredi 20 mars 2015 à 07:07 +0100, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> Grégoire,
>
>
> there wa
Hi Ingo,
> It seems to me that you misread the documentation. It reads:
[...]
> The combining (non-spacing) variant shown before the parenthesis
> only applies in the context of the .composite request.
Indeed. Thank you!
"Anthony J. Bentley" writes:
> Ingo Schwarze writes:
> > Hi Carsten,
> >
> > Carsten Kunze wrote on Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:07:55PM +0100:
> >
> > > in groff_char.7 it is specified that U+0303 is output for \(a~ but
> > > actually U+007E is output. Why does the output (of nroff -Tutf8)
> > > dif
Ingo Schwarze writes:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Carsten Kunze wrote on Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:07:55PM +0100:
>
> > in groff_char.7 it is specified that U+0303 is output for \(a~ but
> > actually U+007E is output. Why does the output (of nroff -Tutf8)
> > differ from the specification?
>
> It seems to
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Kunze wrote on Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:07:55PM +0100:
> in groff_char.7 it is specified that U+0303 is output for \(a~ but
> actually U+007E is output. Why does the output (of nroff -Tutf8)
> differ from the specification?
It seems to me that you misread the documentation.
Hello,
in groff_char.7 it is specified that U+0303 is output for \(a~ but actually
U+007E is output. Why does the output (of nroff -Tutf8) differ from the
specification?
Carsten
> Here, it spots two more flaws. [...]
Committed, thanks.
> glilypond.pl has `use warnings' and friends at the start, but they are
> commented out.
Well, Bernd should take care of it. Unfortunately, he doesn't reacty
since a longer time...
Werner
Hi Werner,
> there was a typo in glilypond.pl, now fixed in git (see attached
> diff).
...
> --- a/contrib/glilypond/glilypond.pl
> +++ b/contrib/glilypond/glilypond.pl
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ our $Read =
> $ly = new FH_FILE($path_ly);
>
> my $include
