Hi Ingo,
On Wed, Mar 11 2015 at 04:15:09 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
[...]
> It took me some more time to get round to testing than i thought,
> but i finally did some.
>
> I just tested the INSTALL.REPO bootstrapping procedure and "make
> dist" on OpenBSD 5.7-release (to be released on May 1, 2015)
Hi Werner,
Werner LEMBERG wrote on Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 07:38:44PM +0100:
> Well, the ms macros are *much* simpler than mdoc's highly nested macro
> parsing. You should really try unprocessed vs. processed mdoc,
> applied to a very long man page, and you will see a significant
> difference in pr
On Wed 11 Mar 2015 09:36:15 Ellam ByDefault wrote:
> I'm writing a document parser which outputs to groff to be processed with
> gropdf.
> When the parse document contains unicode ellipsis (u+2026), it goes fine
> with few groff fonts, namely Times, Helvetica, Courier.
> But with Palatino and the r
Hi,
Werner LEMBERG wrote on Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:29:15AM +0100:
> Peter Schaffter wrote:
>> Doug McIlroy wrote:
>>> So it looks to me as if the policy of distributing mildly
>>> compressed macro packages has only two perceptible effects: it
>>> complicates maintenance and it complicates unders
Hi Bertrand,
Bertrand Garrigues wrote on Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:33:09AM +0100:
> Therefore I've just merged the automake3 branch in master and removed
> the three branches that were used for this development (automake,
> automake2, automake3). As discussed several times before the work was
> sp
Hi,
Werner wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > Truth is, I've never been happy with om.tmac being stripped of
> > comments and indenting. [...]
>
> It's easy to revert this, and maybe it's time to do this, given that
> computers are now much faster than a few years ago.
I think it's just `>tmac/strip.sed
