[Groff] Git branching workflow (was: License for files with »ideal« parts)

2014-09-16 Thread Bertrand Garrigues
Hello Steffen, On Tue, Sep 16 2014 at 11:19:41 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > [1] > > Why does groff not take advantage of git(1) and introduce a second > regular work branch? I think that has been mentioned several > times on

Re: [Groff] License for files with »ideal« parts

2014-09-16 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Carsten Kunze wrote: > is there any (AT&T) ideal(1) (open :-) source code anywhere? I > wonder that it has been developed at AT&T but it is not in DWB or > Plan9... Not from AT&T. I corresponded with Chris Van Wyk a few years ago, when he told me ideal

Re: [Groff] License for files with »ideal« parts

2014-09-16 Thread Bernd Warken
> Von: "Ralph Corderoy" > > > Your best bet may be to write a mail to Professor Chris Van Wyk (the > > Copyright holder in the sense of the Berne Convention) and kindly ask > > him for permission. > > Eric Raymond contacted the professor in March this year, so it would be > nice not to contact h

Re: [Groff] License for files with »ideal« parts

2014-09-16 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Ingo, > Your best bet may be to write a mail to Professor Chris Van Wyk (the > Copyright holder in the sense of the Berne Convention) and kindly ask > him for permission. Eric Raymond contacted the professor in March this year, so it would be nice not to contact him again without taking up the

Re: [Groff] License for files with »ideal« parts

2014-09-16 Thread Carsten Kunze
Hello, is there any (AT&T) ideal(1) (open :-) source code anywhere? I wonder that it has been developed at AT&T but it is not in DWB or Plan9... Carsten

Re: [Groff] License for files with »ideal« parts

2014-09-16 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello, Ingo Schwarze wrote: |Bernd Warken wrote on Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:24:59PM +0200: |> This is about MIT licenses for `ideal' files. | |These files almost certainly do not belong to the MIT. |In conclusion, i see no indication that you might be entitled |to redistribute these files.

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-16 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Igno, > $ man ksh | grep '^...[^ ]' That's nice, but has a bug in that space can be the fourth character on a line that starts with a non-space. $ comm -3 <(man bash | grep '^...[^ ]' | sort) \ > <(man bash | egrep '^([^ ]|...[^ ])' | sort) BUG REPORTS GN