Re: [Groff] License for font tree

2014-09-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The font files (tree /font) do not have a license. > Will it be useful to add one? No. Those are generated files, some of them slightly massaged after the conversion. > I'm not sure, where they came form. devX... looks like ancient X > Window stuff. Yes, created by xtotroff, and X11 has not

Re: [Groff] Overview, Sept. 2014

2014-09-12 Thread Peter Schaffter
Bertrand -- On Fri, Sep 12, 2014, Bertrand Garrigues wrote: > I would not be afraid to dive into the source code. Although my main > language is C, not C++, groff's C++ code seems quite understandable for > a C programmer, as it was already said in the list. The problem is that > I didn't feel I h

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-12 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
|Ingo Schwarze wrote: ||Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:22:22PM +0200: ||> anyway, i really think that -mdoc would need a few more commands ||> so that it would be possible to create "better" documents with it, ||> where "better" refers to usability and user experience. ||

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-12 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hallo Ingo, Ingo Schwarze wrote: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:22:22PM +0200: |> anyway, i really think that -mdoc would need a few more commands |> so that it would be possible to create "better" documents with it, |> where "better" refers to usability and user experienc