[Groff] UTF-8/Unicode Implementation, Paragraph-at-once Formatting and Right to Left Text

2014-08-05 Thread Yves Cloutier
Hello, Just wanted to bring this to the attention of the list. Neatroff - a C implementation of Troff. Supports unicode, does paragraph level formatting instead of line by line and also supports right-to-left text for languages that write in this direction. May be worth a look to see how some o

Re: [Groff] \o and \z do not work for -Tutf8

2014-08-05 Thread Bernd Warken
> Von: "Werner LEMBERG" > > If you want to create artificial glyphs using `.char' and friends for > -Tps or -Tdvi, please create a separate macro package so that pinyin > support can be loaded with `-mpinyin' or something similar. That looks good, the tmac dir looks interesting. > > For more id

Re: [Groff] \o and \z do not work for -Tutf8

2014-08-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Can these characters be made into new glyphs? `groff_char.7' is > already quite good for unusual characters - and these are mostly > available for `-Tutf8'. If someone could tell me, how to append new > glyphs, I would try to implement this. It's not clear to me what you mean with `append', p

Re: [Groff] \o and \z do not work for -Tutf8

2014-08-05 Thread Bernd Warken
> Von: "Ralph Corderoy" > > Bernd, I think you need to Google up `pinyin and unicode'. Yes, good isea. There is a complete setting for all `pinyin' characters in Unicode and has also many links to related web pages: http://www.sino.uni-heidelberg.de/course_resources/s02/py-vowels.htm There

Re: [Groff] \o and \z do not work for -Tutf8

2014-08-05 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> [...] it's the man program that tells the terminal to overstrike. > I think. The terminal (usually) doesn't overstrike. If you have GROFF_NO_SGR set, then grotty outputs and sequences, from which most of today's terminals print only the last , so boldness and underlines get lost. However, m

Re: [Groff] \o and \z do not work for -Tutf8

2014-08-05 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Keith, > > Both escapes are documented in Osanna/Kernioghan `CSTR 54' and many > > other ancient `roff' documentations. So `nroff' should be able to > > do that as well. Every typewriter could do such overstriking. > > But a video terminal is not a typewriter. Video terminals can display >

Re: [Groff] \o and \z do not work for -Tutf8

2014-08-05 Thread Ted Harding
On 05-Aug-2014 00:44:25 James K. Lowden wrote: > On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 23:19:41 +0100 > Keith Marshall wrote: > >> OTOH, when a typewriter overstrikes, the accumulation of all glyphs >> struck remains indelibly impressed on the printed page. > > [OT] > > The symbol set of APL took advantage of th