On Thu, Apr 24, 2014, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2012-09/msg00070.html
> >
> > When I checked the archive for this, the index.tmac and markup.ist are
> > both .bin files. What gives?
>
> I'm guessing Mailman doesn't recognise the suffix
Hi,
I'm having some trouble getting non-ASCII characters to work in my
mom-based documents. With pdfmom -k I get them to work without problem
in running text, but, when I use them inside quotes in .HEADING and
.TITLE I receive errors similar to:
noname.mom:60: can't translate character code 229 t
On 23/04/14 22:42, (Ted Harding) wrote:
> I think some confusion is possibly arising here. See in-line below.
>
> On 23-Apr-2014 20:45:10 Keith Marshall wrote:
>> Doesn't a paragraph logically conclude at any request which introduces a
>> break? Or invocation of any macro which itself invokes suc
Peter Schaffter wrote:
|BTW--does anyone know how KP/TeX handles paragraphs with "spread"
|(.brp) lines?
\def\@fillbr{\ifvmode\else\unskip\hfill\penalty-1\fi\relax}%
\def\@nofillbr{\ifvmode\else\penalty-1\fi\relax}%
% ('\\' is redefined in some envs)
\let\\\@fillbr%
\def\br{\\
Hi Peter,
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2012-09/msg00070.html
>
> When I checked the archive for this, the index.tmac and markup.ist are
> both .bin files. What gives?
I'm guessing Mailman doesn't recognise the suffixes and that's why it's
serving up
$ curl -sSI
http://l
I've found this with attachments to archive entries, so I downloaded
them and found they're plain text.
Denis
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:37:15 -0400
Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Denis --
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014, Denis M. Wilson wrote:
> > 7. I posted previously in this group. See
> > http://lists
On 12/29/13, I wrote:
> This bug report concerns the -me macro set's handling of the .(b and
> .)b macro pair. [snip]
>
> An earlier bug in this macro pair was present in groff 1.21 (see
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-groff/2012-12/msg00011.html);
> in 1.22.2, this bug has been fixed, but
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 07:30:34PM -0400, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014, Ted Harding wrote:
> > I think some confusion is possibly arising here. See in-line below.
> >
> > > Doesn't a paragraph logically conclude at any request which introduces a
> > > break? Or invocation of any m
