Peter Schaffter :
> It isn't groff's place to produce presentationally-neutral output, but
> rather to receive presentationally-neutral output and interpret
> it for typesetting. The logical flow isn't groff => XSL-FO, it's
> XSL-FO => groff.
Agreed. This sounds like you and I are coming to the
A reasonably small update, which would demonstrate what can be done,
might be to port GNU fmt(1)’s paragraph algorithm to groff’s nroff.
(It is based on TeX’s, but simplified for character cell terminals.
As such, it should be a perfect fit for nroff and provide a hint of
what could be done for tr
On 04/03/14 12:55:48, Clarke Echols wrote:
I've been using groff to create a PostScript file, then I use the
Linux convert command:
convert file.ps file.pdf
and I've never had a problem with people reading it when I email it
to them, whether they're on mobile devices, PCs, or Macs.
D
I've been using groff to create a PostScript file, then I use the
Linux convert command:
convert file.ps file.pdf
and I've never had a problem with people reading it when I email it
to them, whether they're on mobile devices, PCs, or Macs.
Did I miss something?
Clarke
On 03/03/2014 03:38
I found myself a way out:
with the convert command you can turn a .pdf to a .pdf
convert foo.pdf foo1.pdf
You can read foo1 with adobe reader.
Well, the text ist not very sharp, an not very nice to read.
But it's better than nothing.
Cheers
Gregoire Babey
Le lundi 24 février 2014 à 01:40 +01
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014, Pierre-Jean wrote:
> But, to effectively use the paragraph at once adjustment, one
> need to patch the macro sets (or create some new ones).
> Because of the architecture of troff, things are done this
> way:
> - when troff format the paragraph at once, it also
> deal with d
I thought I'd leave Future Redux alone for a while to see where
the cards fell.
List members, apparently, suffer somewhat from ADD because--no real
surprise--it forked into a discussion about manpages. I've no
quibble with that, but if we're to figure out what to do about groff
in the future, we'
On 03/01/2014 04:41 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
I think it makes more sense to make sureman:foo and similar URLs do
sensible things in all the browsers people use. While there are
exceptions, if you want to see something in a browser, it's usually more
natural to start from that browser's URL bar.
