On Feb 6, 2013, at 7:45 PM, "James K. Lowden" wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:23:15 +
> Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>
>>> Is there an implementation of ideal to go with the manual?
>>
>> I heard second-hand that Christopher Van Wyk states Alcatel-Lucent own
>> the copyright
>
> Confirmed. He
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:23:15 +
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > Is there an implementation of ideal to go with the manual?
>
> I heard second-hand that Christopher Van Wyk states Alcatel-Lucent own
> the copyright
Confirmed. He told me so himself.
Ideal would not be trivial to reimplement, eit
Hi Daniel,
> > www.usm.lmu.de/~hoffmann/roff/103.pdf
>
> Is there an implementation of ideal to go with the manual?
I heard second-hand that Christopher Van Wyk states Alcatel-Lucent own
the copyright and they, not him, provided the source code to someone in
2010-11. Perhaps some research wil
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:30:25PM +0100, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > 103.ps.gz is broken, beginning at page 5. Does anyone have
> > another format or knows about that?
>
> I hacked the PS file to create a PDF that appears to be okay:
>
> www.usm.lmu.de/~hoffmann/roff/103.pdf
Is there an im
Hi,
Bernd wrote:
> > Which files will we need?
>
> See http://troff.org/papers.html. There are the CSTR-files, but also
> a lot of other ps-files.
Tadziu, I just ran ps2pdf(1) to convert the original 54.ps to 54.pdf.
If this is valid then I can do it for the others too.
> Is it posssible to st
