Correction. Lesk's intro to -ms is at
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/7thEdMan/vol2/msmacros.bun
Sorry for the error,
Doug McIlroy
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012, trebol wrote:
> ...but for now I prefer play with the gear, nuts and bolts and
> keep me near the groff’s bases to learn the system so
> maybe I’ll try ms
Given how you want to approach learning groff, ms would be my
choice, too.
--
Peter Schaffter
Author of The Binbrook
> Can anyone tell me a short introduction to the ms, mm, me, mom macro packages?
Because it's been in my fingers for 30 years, I use ms and the preprocessors
for everything that I'm likely to want to keep the source for. It requires
you to know some underlying troff, for example to set number regi
Thanks, Luis, Brian. This is the sort of testimony I’m look‐
ing for.
>I believe mom is a good choice for starting out with groff
>since both the documentation and the macros themselves are
>newbie friendly.
Thanks Peter. I think mom may be in the future the LaTeX of
groff (without waste 1G
trebol writes:
> Hello all,
Hi
> I?m new using groff.
Cool!
> Can anyone tell me a short introduc?
> tion to the ms, mm, me, mom macro packages? I would like to
I have been working with the mm Macros since the 1987. I'm more
familiar with them. However, I've worked on some of these set
