On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Larry Kollar wrote:
> For most of what Author-It does, we could have done it a lot cheaper and with
> much higher performance by deploying a CVS server on the network and using
> groff.
Is the suggestion to use `CVS server' as an alternative just a
particularly
Peter Schaffter wrote:
> It does no good to emphasize the universal portability of groff
> documents, for reasons I know too well: if the publisher I send
> a work of fiction to is a Wordie--they all are--I have no choice
> but to provide them with MSWord documents.
Not that traditional publishe
