On Mon, May 14, 2012, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On 05/13/2012 10:53 PM, Peter Schaffter wrote:
>
> > Let's face it: filtering a groff document through sed or awk so
> > it becomes acceptable rtf, readable by MSWord, is not for the
> > inexperienced.
>
> I've never had occasion to put it to the test
On 05/13/2012 10:53 PM, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Let's face it: filtering a groff document through sed or awk so
> it becomes acceptable rtf, readable by MSWord, is not for the
> inexperienced.
I've never had occasion to put it to the test, but does Paul DuBois's
troff2rtf meet this requirement?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Let's face it: filtering a groff document through sed or
> awk so it becomes acceptable rtf, readable by MSWord, is
> not for the inexperienced.
This sounds like a fault of the groff [eco]system.
