> Is there any reason why changing the font should not
> change the baseline also ?
Yes. Simple example: assume you want to set just a few words in
a smaller size, but this short sequence of words happens to wrap
at the end of the line. With which baseline spacing should
the line be set? That
Am 19.01.2011 um 17:00 schrieb walter harms:
this works much better. Is there any reason why changing the font
should not change the baseline also ?
In fact, it does. But perhaps only within a certain range of sizes and
-main reason- in normal text mode which is perhaps not sufficient for
walter harms wrote:
Am 19.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Tadziu Hoffmann:
.ps 16
I have tried but the result is not realy different. The
postscript files differ only in two lines. (i admit i have
no idea why). And that do not affect the box size.
The important part was also changing the linespacin
Am 19.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Tadziu Hoffmann:
>
>>> .ps 16
>
>> I have tried but the result is not realy different. The
>> postscript files differ only in two lines. (i admit i have
>> no idea why). And that do not affect the box size.
>
> The important part was also changing the linespacing,
> > .ps 16
> I have tried but the result is not realy different. The
> postscript files differ only in two lines. (i admit i have
> no idea why). And that do not affect the box size.
The important part was also changing the linespacing,
.vs 20
otherwise you're setting 16-point type on a (de
Am 18.01.2011 20:02, schrieb Deri James:
> On Tuesday 18 Jan 2011 17:51:22 walter harms wrote:
>> Hello List,
>> i have found an oddity with tbl and large fonts.
>> i got the request to make the fonts larger to inprove readability.
>> i added the \s16 and found that the width seems to scale but n
> After refreshing my source tree from the current CVS, I realized
> there is another typo, which seems to be just introduced.
Umpf. Applied, thanks.
Werner
Hi Werner,
>> I think there is a small typo in the documentation for the pic
>> preprocessor (doc/pic.ms in the source tree). Compare figure 3-1 and
>> the source code for the figure, which is printed after the figure.
>
> Patch applied, thanks.
After refreshing my source tree from the current C
