> As you say, "..." produces centred dots in eqn. Groff's eqn (1.18.1)
> does not recognise the token 'cdots', and 'man eqn' does not mention
> it.
This has been changed in 1.20 (and discussed on the mailing list); to
cite the man page:
GNU eqn sets the input token "..." as three periods or l
> Is there something like latex' "underbrace"/"overbrace" in groff/eqn
> or has someone written a macro for it already? I really miss that
> feature because it's a pretty concise way to mark and explain terms
> in equations.
I'm not aware of such a macro.
> If not and someone happens to be in a
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 04:49:43PM -0500, Timothy Groves wrote:
> Has anyone come up with filters, macros, etc., to produce an ePub
> file from groff source?
Since ePub is basically XHTML in a zip file, you could create one with
-Txhtml. The problem with using groff here is that the text has to b
Has anyone come up with filters, macros, etc., to produce an ePub file
from groff source?
PS: One thing I forgot to mention (below) is that the token ",...,"
(i.e. comma and 3 dots and comma with no spaces) will place the three
dots on the baseline, in line with the commas, as in
for $r ^=^ 1 , 2 ,..., N$
However, this then devolves the entire layout of the sequence to eqn.
In pract
On 17-Dec-10 08:28:11, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> Hello,
> according to man eqn an ellipsis of three subsequent dots will be
> replaced by a real ellipsis, whereas to get three centered dots one
> should use cdots.
> However when I enter ... I get cdots and I wouldn't know how to get a
> real ellipsis,
Hello,
according to man eqn an ellipsis of three subsequent dots will be
replaced by a real ellipsis, whereas to get three centered dots one
should use cdots.
However when I enter ... I get cdots and I wouldn't know how to get a
real ellipsis, since there does not appear to be an ellipsis glyph in
