Okay, thanks. The fact that there is a space between the two parts of the
second argument threw me. I interpreted that to be a third argument.
Thanks.
Blake McBride
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > While looking at the MM code I noticed a line:
> >
> > .ie d misc*st
Yes, this does work. Thank you very much!!
Blake McBride
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > I think this is the solution to go, and I'll implement it if I have
> > time: Use an ms-like underlining macro if either .ce or .rj is
> > active.
>
> Please try the attached
Greetings,
I am having some trouble with groffer that I haven't been able to figure our
too easily. If I do:
groffer --ps --ps-viewer gv groff
everything works fine. But if I do:
groffer --ps --ps-viewer evince groff
It doesn't display the pages (although "evince file.ps" works fine
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009, Werner Lemberg wrote:
> > I don't suppose there's any chance of underlining for the PostScript
> > device being implemented in groff itself, is there? Sure would make
> > things a lot easier.
>
> Please make suggestions how this could work. I need a solution which
> can be
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009, Blake McBride wrote:
> MOM has main headings, sub-headings, and paragraph headings. Each has it's
> own set of macros, and there is a limited number of levels. Is there a
> reason for this? MM has it generalised. It uses fewer macros and goes to
> more levels. I don't und
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009, Blake McBride wrote:
> I am using lists in MOM and am having the following difficulties.
>
> .IL works but .ILX has no effect in lists.
>
> Given:
>
> Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.
> .LIST DIGIT
> .ITEM
> The first item.
> .IL 3m
> .PP
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009, Blake McBride wrote:
> I think space between list items should be controlled by .PARA_SPACE. But
> rather than breaking everything out there, perhaps there should be a new
> macro called .LIST_SPACE that works like .PARA_SPACE but for lists. Without
> this macro, a user is f
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009, Blake McBride wrote:
> I'd like to label nested lists with the enclosing list's number using MM
> like the following:
>
> 1. First item
> 1.1. First sub-item of the first list
> 1.2. Second sub-item of the first list
> 2. Second item
> 2.1. First sub-item of
Greetings,
MOM has main headings, sub-headings, and paragraph headings. Each has it's
own set of macros, and there is a limited number of levels. Is there a
reason for this? MM has it generalised. It uses fewer macros and goes to
more levels. I don't understand this?
Thanks.
Blake McBride
> While looking at the MM code I noticed a line:
>
> .ie d misc*st-\\$1 .ds misc*st-\\$1 \\$2 \\*[misc*st-\\$1]
>
> It seems like .ds is taking three arguments.
No, only two. The argument to the string name `misc*st-\\$1' is
`\\$2 \\*[misc*st-\\$1]'. `info groff' should give all the details.
Greetings,
I think space between list items should be controlled by .PARA_SPACE. But
rather than breaking everything out there, perhaps there should be a new
macro called .LIST_SPACE that works like .PARA_SPACE but for lists. Without
this macro, a user is forced to create their own macro which e
Greetings,
I am using lists in MOM and am having the following difficulties.
.IL works but .ILX has no effect in lists.
Given:
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.
.LIST DIGIT
.ITEM
The first item.
.IL 3m
.PP
Some paragraph text. Some paragraph text. Some paragrap
12 matches
Mail list logo
