> Are there any plans to add "modern" font handling and format support
> a la "htroff" to groff or -mom to "htroff" or am I stuck at the
> moment...
No, unfortunately.
Werner
"Michael Kerpan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After joining this board (and being mostly a lurker), I've been clued
> in to the awesome -mom macro package. I'd like to use it with my
> extensive collection of OTF fonts, but it seems like groff's font
> support rather lags behind that of Heirloom t
After joining this board (and being mostly a lurker), I've been clued
in to the awesome -mom macro package. I'd like to use it with my
extensive collection of OTF fonts, but it seems like groff's font
support rather lags behind that of Heirloom troff... Are there any
plans to add "modern" font hand