Re: [Groff] First round of cleabnup patches

2007-01-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > > All new macros defined in these changes have two-character names, > > > > Hmm. Not quite correct -- see .URL and .MTO. > > Those aren't new, they're transplanted from www.tmac. Ah yes, I misunderstood the word `new' in your answer. > > As written in another mail, it's fine for to use the

Re: [Groff] First round of cleabnup patches

2007-01-14 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This is my first set of cleanup patches for the groff man pages. > > Thanks! I'm now going to add this slowly to the CVS. Let me know when you're done, as it won't really be fe for me to do more cleanup until things are in a stable state. > > All new macr

Re: [Groff] First round of cleabnup patches

2007-01-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> This is my first set of cleanup patches for the groff man pages. Thanks! I'm now going to add this slowly to the CVS. > All new macros defined in these changes have two-character names, Hmm. Not quite correct -- see .URL and .MTO. As written in another mail, it's fine for to use the .UR/.UE

Re: [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation

2007-01-14 Thread Keith Marshall
On Friday 05 January 2007 22:47, D. E. Evans wrote: >But xhtml-1.0+ *requires* that tags be represented in *lower* >case *only*, and any mixed or upper case representation is >(strictly) invalid. AIUI, today's web authors really should be >striving towards xhtml standards complianc