On Sunday 30 July 2006 4:03 pm, Keith Marshall wrote:
> > I'd fix that sed script myself if I had a faintest idea how to
> > reliably distinguish a valid embedded EPS from a blank page.
>
> The problem with this sed script was that it would delete EVERYTHING
> from the `%%Page: n n' marker record f
> A (apparently) valid groff metric (SFOR) is produced, but the
> following is dumped to stderr:
>
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at /usr/local/bin/afmtodit line
> 6446.
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at /usr/local/bin/afmtodit line
> 6446.
> Use of uninitializ
> When I run
>
> groff -mru test > test.ps
>
> I get only some of the letters in the output test.ps (I included it
> in attachment).
Ah, sorry, this is a bug in groff 1.19.2, already fixed in the current
CVS. grops uses wrong subfont indices.
Werner
__
On Saturday 17 June 2006 3:07 am, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> One issue I had is that your sed script erased completely valid EPS
> files (created by ImageMagick convert program from JPG and PNG)
> embedded in my presentations. Thus I decided to make it an empty
> script for --emit-ps option. If yo
