Re: [gpfsug-discuss] S3 API and POSIX rights

2021-01-07 Thread IBM Spectrum Scale
) team. From: Lukas Hejtmanek To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org Date: 06-01-2021 11.22 PM Subject:[EXTERNAL] [gpfsug-discuss] S3 API and POSIX rights Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org Hello, we are playing a bit with Spectrum Scale OBJ storage. We were

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] S3 API and POSIX rights

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Nelson
Unfortunately, these features are not supported. Multipart uploads are not supported with Unified File and Object for the reason you mentioned, as the separate parts of the object are written as separate files. And because the S3 and Swift authentication is handled differently, the user is not p

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] S3 API and POSIX rights

2021-01-06 Thread Josh Catana
Swift and s3 are both object storage, but different protocol implementation. Not compatible. I use minio to share data for s3 compatibility. On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 12:52 PM Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > we are playing a bit with Spectrum Scale OBJ storage. We were able to get > working unifi

[gpfsug-discuss] S3 API and POSIX rights

2021-01-06 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
Hello, we are playing a bit with Spectrum Scale OBJ storage. We were able to get working unified access for NFS and OBJ but only if we use swift clients. If we use s3 client for OBJ, all objects are owned by swift user and large objects are multiparted wich is not suitable for unified access. Sho