[gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object - summary

2024-02-28 Thread Alexander Saupp
Hi all, there was a couple of very good concerns, questions and statements already. I’d like to summarize my very personal understanding – not necessarily officially speaking for my employer IBM. Be invited to reach out to IBM Client Engineering (a presales invest by IBM) if you have a need to

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread Andi Nør Christiansen
MinIO is not supported on GPFS, just an fyi. Had a long discussion with them about that as we also had CES S3 that we wanted to move away from. We went in the same direction as Renar. Best Regards Andi Nør ChristiansenIT Solution Specialist Mobile +45 23 89 59 75 E-mail

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread Brian Nelson
The migration of objects stored in the existing Swift-based Object protocol will depend on whether they're stored as traditional Swift objects or as regular files (Unified File and Object mode). As you may have seen, the objects uploaded to Object protocol will end up on disk in one of two namin

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread DOUGLAS O'FLAHERTY
IBM has highighting object evolution to Nooba and containerized ‘high performance object’ in various user group presentations. This is the link to Chris Maestas’ presentation from SC23. https://www.spectrumscaleug.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/SSUG23SC-Whats-new-in-Storage-Scale.pdf Slide is ab

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread Stephan Graf
Hi Christoph, we are running CES-Object in production and are facing the same issue that this solution is deprecated. Our security division sending us scan reports that the server are running an python version which is not in support any more (and we should upgrade). So we are looking for anot

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread Grunenberg, Renar
Hallo Daniel, Christoph, currently IBM make a not good job on that, but it's light on that topic. Currently you can use Swift/s3 on 5.1.9.1 with a backlevel scale (swift) version. But i don't recommend this. Since 5.1.3.1 you can use IBM Spectrum Scale DAS S3 -Service (containerized s3 endpoints

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Daniel, Am 28.02.24 um 17:06 schrieb Kidger, Daniel: I would assume it is because most customers want to use the S3 Interface rather than the Swift one? And Openstack/Swift is very complex. So I can understand why IBM gets rid of it. But 5.1.9.1 has no object support at all. There is no

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread Kidger, Daniel
Cristoph, I would assume it is because most customers want to use the S3 Interface rather than the Swift one? Daniel Daniel Kidger HPC Storage Solutions Architect, EMEA daniel.kid...@hpe.com +44 (0)7818 522266   hpe.com -Original Message- From: gpfsug-discuss On Behalf Of Christo

[gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object

2024-02-28 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi folks, https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/storage-scale/5.1.9?topic=upgrading-object-packages says: CES Swift Object protocol feature is not supported from IBM Storage Scale 5.1.9 onwards. IBM Storage Scale 5.1.8 is the last release that has CES Swift Object protocol. Please contact IBM for f