Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-12 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
>The interesting question: is it possible? Are the originating > mails stored so that the visible html can be repaired? A mathematician, a physicist, and an engineer walk into a bar. The mathematician says "The raw mail exists even the old stuff is in offline cold storage. It can be matched by me

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-12 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Christian, *, Christian Lohmaier schrieb: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier > wrote: [..] >> The initial posting's broken link remains broken: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html > I personally did not expect all indexed mails

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-12 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > Hi Jeff, *, > > Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: > >>> ((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp) > >>Tested and live. Thanks guys. Thanks a lot! > The initial posting's broken link remains broken: > http://w

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-12 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: >> ((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp) >Tested and live. Thanks guys. The initial posting's broken link remains broken: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html Does this mean that's true fo

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-11 Thread Mail Archive Support
>You could also add the prefix to the method, as alternative to the >already existing cid case. >((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp) Thank you, Christian. Sending this guinea pig to make sure it works as expected. Test data below: j...@jab.org http://j...@jab.org m

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-11 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
> ((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp) Tested and live. Thanks guys.

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-11 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: > There are two cases that are very common and handled poorly. One > is an http hyperlink to mail-archive.com as we've been discussing. > The other is a a mailto hyperlink. These are correctly obfuscated, > but end up as a broken link. Better to not have a l

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread John Van Essen
Well then - if you want to obfuscate anything that looks like an email address EXCEPT an email address representing one of the 5000+ lists being archived here, then really the only way to do that is to have a hash of all the list addresses and check for those in the section. if ($ENV{'MAILLIST'}

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
There are two cases that are very common and handled poorly. One is an http hyperlink to mail-archive.com as we've been discussing. The other is a a mailto hyperlink. These are correctly obfuscated, but end up as a broken link. Better to not have a link than a broken one. http://www.mail-archive.

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Micah Cowan
(12/10/2010 02:31 PM), Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: >> IIRC, the source of this discussion was that a URL that >> uses an @ was getting munged. If this is not desired, >> the author can use %40 in the URL and this will bypass >> the filtering done by M-A. > > Shure, we will succeed to convince all

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Earl, *, Did You read the mails? Earl Hood schrieb: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: >>> Once can avoid the munging on the authoring side be URL escaping >>> the @ character with %40 >> shure harvesters don't know the trick? :o)) > IIRC, the source of this dis

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Earl, *, Earl Hood schrieb: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: >>> You could also add the prefix to the method, as alternative to the >>> already existing cid case. >>> ((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp) >>> This one should work in

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Christian, *, Christian Lohmaier schrieb: [...] > I had a quick look at MHonArc sources and there are two possible > points where the behavriour can be tweaked. > One is the expression that identifies email-addresses in lib/mhinit.pl [.. cleaning classes, running to a mirror to look whether

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Friedrich, *; On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > > long time no see .. ;o)) :-) > Christian Lohmaier schrieb: >>On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier > [...] > in this case - I fear isn't the right thing to do or > the "feeding" code has to be ad

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Christian, *, long time no see .. ;o)) Christian Lohmaier schrieb: >On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier > wrote: >> Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: >> [..] >>> http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html >>> [..] >> Did You already stumble over the d

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Friedrich, *, On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: > > [..] > >> http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html > >> >> $orig_address = $_; >> $address = lc($orig_address); >> if ($ENV{'MAILLIST'} eq $address) { >>    #

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: [..] > Your feature request is valid and if you are feeling eager, feel free > to send in a patch. Otherwise we'll get to it when inspiration > strikes (and I have to warn you, inspiration can be rather slow to > strike sometimes...). I know of :o)). > htt

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-09 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
The Mail Archive does have to be very aggressive to obfuscate email addresses, otherwise a lot of people go bonkers. But yes, it is dumb to break a hyperlink, especially a hyperlink to The Mail Archive. Your feature request is valid and if you are feeling eager, feel free to send in a patch. Otherw

Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-09 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi folks, I'm from LibreOffice community and noticed that links in archived mails containing an "@" are screwed up, assuming to hide an emailadress. This isn't a good thing, because especially links pointing to other mail-archive.com Mails are broken. see for example: http://www.mail-archive.com/