Jeff Breidenbach wrote in
:
|As I've mentioned in the past, Mail Archive is alive and well in most
|respects. The one exceptions is customer support, for which I am
That is adorable.
|The service is hosted in the United States, and you might have heard
|about an upcoming election in this cou
Hello Jeff.
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20200725174622.qd5fb%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Jeff Breidenbach wrote in
|:
||I checked and for whatever reason, they simply aren't sending email to
||arch...@mail-archive.com. No idea why. If you can help make that happen,
||archiving will work again.
|
Hello Jeff!
Jeff Breidenbach wrote in
:
|Hi Steffen,
|
|I checked and for whatever reason, they simply aren't sending email to
|arch...@mail-archive.com. No idea why. If you can help make that happen,
|archiving will work again.
I will forward it.
|While we are talking, I wants folks to kn
Hi Steffen,
I checked and for whatever reason, they simply aren't sending email to
arch...@mail-archive.com. No idea why. If you can help make that happen,
archiving will work again.
While we are talking, I wants folks to know that the Mail Archive itself is
running fine (knock on wood). But I ca
>What type of partial match search is supported on mail-archive?
Here's the short and long explanation of search syntax.
https://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#search
https://www.mail-archive.com/searching.html
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-ar
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 7:22 PM Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
> So far, so good with this transition. Happy 2019 to everyone.
Thanks for keeping this awesome service running. Happy New Year!
Yang
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossi
So far, so good with this transition. Happy 2019 to everyone.
Jeff
>
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.com
https://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/gossip
I don't know the full process but I'm pretty sure it involves reversing the
polarity on the phase capacitor, if that might get you started.
--
Matt Morgan
m...@concretecomputing.com
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018, at 7:13 AM, suren...@iitk.ac.in wrote:
> Hello SIESTA users,
>
> I have to calculate b
Thanks for the report. There was a bug in list name validation. Should be
fixed now.
Jeff
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.com
https://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/gossip
Sorry for missing this earlier. There is no self service mechanism for
downloading
raw mail, in pat to prevent address harvesting. The normal procedure
is to contact
support team with a request.
Unfortunately this is an 11 year old mailing list, and a bunch of the
raw mail has
been moved to very c
The Mail Archive has switched certificate authorities, and dropped extended
validation. Please let me know if you notice any problems.
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.com
https://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailma
Glad you were able to get things working. For search experts out there, The
Mail Archive uses Lucene search syntax. See the following documentation.
http://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#search
http://www.mail-archive.com/searching.html
More specifically, the site uses the default Lucene query par
On 04/22/2017 11:12 AM, Matt Morgan wrote:
On 04/20/2017 06:15 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
On 4/20/17 4:43 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
I guess what I'm asking, is there an easy path from mail-archive.com
search results into a spreadsheet (I guess mySQL or postgres would be
OK too) or some other kind
On 04/20/2017 06:15 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
On 4/20/17 4:43 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
I guess what I'm asking, is there an easy path from mail-archive.com
search results into a spreadsheet (I guess mySQL or postgres would be
OK too) or some other kind of analysis tool?
I thought about doing th
On 4/20/17 4:43 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
> I guess what I'm asking, is there an easy path from mail-archive.com
> search results into a spreadsheet (I guess mySQL or postgres would be
> OK too) or some other kind of analysis tool?
I thought about doing this in Node.js but that would require a bit mo
We use MHonArc to render emails for the web, which is open source.
So any impatient programmers who are really hungry for this feature
may want to dust off their Perl programming skills.
Jeff
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@ma
Hi,
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> strip the large attachment? Extra bonus points for replacing it with
> a smaller attachment containing text indicating that the large
> attachment had been stripped.
And a star for stating a digest, e.g. SHA256, of the stripped attachment
so others can check they've f
On Feb 16, 2017, at 1:48 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
> In addition we have a max message size, which is currently set to 150KB.
> The reason for this is we had serious abuse issues with large messages
> back in the day, and also we don't really want to cater towards attachment
> heavy mailing
Hi Jeff,
> PSA: Per https://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#support, use
> themailarch...@gmail.com for support questions about the Mail Archive.
But https://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#support says
Examples of appropriate topics for gossip@mail-archive.com:
My list does not show up
nt slides or similar
consumes
thousands of times the resource of textual lists.
I am sorry if you were the collateral damage victim of either of these
mechanisms and we're happy to do a re-import missed messages.
___
Gossip mailing list
https://ww
PSA: Per https://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#support, use
themailarch...@gmail.com for support questions about the Mail Archive.
Sorry for the noise, folks!
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> I just noticed this morning that there are some recent mails sent
Thank you for providing an excellent service!
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
> A lot of crazy stuff happened in 2016. Looking back, what parts
> of that touched The Mail Archive?
>
> Let's start with mundane computer stuff. Uptime was great, the service
> was online
Hi Jeff,
> This quite a bummer, as it took a whole lot of paperwork to get that
> EV certificate which presumably will have to be redone with a new
> vendor.
Why bother with an EV? Google don't, nor Facebook IIRC. Go
LetsEncrypt?
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
_
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:44:47PM -0500, Yang Yu wrote:
> According to the bug, the current action affects new certificates
> (including EV) only.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311832
>
> imo StartCom/WoSign won't be able to issue legitimate certificates for
> a while, but they
Hi Jeff,
According to the bug, the current action affects new certificates
(including EV) only.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311832
imo StartCom/WoSign won't be able to issue legitimate certificates for
a while, but they can backdate just like they did before.
On Thu, Oct 20, 20
Thanks for the heads up. Highly appreciated. I'm impressed that you know
the certificate
vendor for The Mail Archive. I was not aware of the drama going on with
StartCom.
Is it correct that the removal only applies to new certificates, and
therefore the
deadline for action is May 3, 2017 when the c
Thanks a lot, Jeff!
Was able to change the behaviour on the server. Archiving works like a
charm now - even within the same list :-)
Cheers!
Marco
On 08/28/2016 07:53 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Ezmlm defaults to "X-No-Archive: Yes" in the header, which
> prohibits archiving. I checked and
Ezmlm defaults to "X-No-Archive: Yes" in the header, which
prohibits archiving. I checked and confirmed that the following
message-id has the anti-archiving header. You'll need to turn
that header off to use The Mail Archive.
ae39af47dd7f5a4a96234b8e6bcac1050112122...@ox-ex.oxid-esales.local
_
You are correct, we match subject lines in absence of explicit
headers. The matching window is the most recent 3000
messages. This was more important two decades ago when
mail user agents were less fastidious with headers. Will think
about it. Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the misthread.
If
Thanks for asking. We had some problems on May 15
during a cascading failure of hard drives. Archiving was
paused for about a day and there was also some downtime
during investigation. No data was lost.
Today archiving was paused for about an hour while the
failed hard disks were being replaced. T
Unable to display full message. Please click here to view this messageerror code: 3338
Unable to display full message. Please click here to view this messageerror code: 7073
Unable to load message please click here to view.
Yes no more warnings on android. Thanks for the quick fix.
Yang
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed report. I made some changes and now
> get a 'A' rating on the online test. Does this fix the Android
> problems?
__
Thanks for the detailed report. I made some changes and now
get a 'A' rating on the online test. Does this fix the Android
problems?
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.com
https://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/
Our inbound spam filtering service, SpamHero, decided that
the confirmation message was phishing. Sending it through
now, and we'll discuss this with the SpamHero folks. Suggestions
for alternate spam filtering services are always welcome.
___
Gossip mail
All the quarantined TDF messages were from you, except for one from
bugzilla. No idea why. Anyway, I've whitelisted both the entire
opendocumentfoundation.org domain, and also you specifically. Yell
if you see any more trouble. Best thing you can do to help is continue
keeping TDF lists from being
Hi Jeff,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> The spam filtering service we use (SpamHero) quarantined that message along
> with some others. I've released the messages from quarantine and also
> adjusted
> the whitelist to hopefully reduce or prevent this from happening in t
The spam filtering service we use (SpamHero) quarantined that message along
with some others. I've released the messages from quarantine and also
adjusted
the whitelist to hopefully reduce or prevent this from happening in the
future.
I'm sorry about this and we would definitely consider switching
A more detailed response was sent over private mail, but the
short answers are (1) yes, as per FAQ (2) thanks for the
suggestion, will add it to the list of things to think about.
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.co
OK, I'm ready with the archives to upload, with 2 questions before I do
so (actually, only the first question is related to the upload):
1. Shall I create the mail-archive entry first and have it start
auto-archiving new mail and wait until that's up and running before
sending you the old arch
This is probably going to work fine, and let's go ahead and give it a
try. If it doesn't work, we'll discuss, figure it out, and try again.
Yeah, I'm probably over-analyzing but getting to this point was
definitely useful since I now have more confidence what my scripts need
to do and what the
Yes, you can safely leave out To, Message-id, and Received.
Consequences are what you'd expect, like the inability to do a
message-id search and find that particular message.
You are correct. Posting address is manually assigned during the bulk
import process, and automatically determined from hea
Jeff,
Thanks again--more things are clear now. But your response raises more
questions in my mind as well. Please bear with me, we're almost there I
think.
Keeping in mind that I am splitting Digests into individual messages, I
have to fake whatever headers are not already there within the
The only things indexed for search are: message-id, subject, date (usually
extracted from the Recieved: header), sender name (extracted
from From: header), posting address (for example, gossip@mail-archive.com),
archival message number, and message body. Every message is sorted and
organized accord
1. Yes, we override list name on import.
OK, so they are threaded and paginated independently of what's in the
"To:" line.
2. Search will have no concept of alternative list names. There is no
reasonable way to overcome this.
Hmm, I don't understand this, given your answer to (1) above. If
1. Yes, we override list name on import.
2. Search will have no concept of alternative list names. There is no
reasonable way to overcome this.
3. Why not use the tool that Earl mentioned?
4. We always merge into the new list name and set up an HTTP redirect so
that the old URLs are not broken. Mer
Still working on processing the old email digests to convert them to
individual emails in mbox format for import.
Meanwhile, though, I thought of a new issue which has to do with
identifying the list name from the email headers, given that the list
name (and consequently the email address in t
Statute of limitations is typically 3 kilomessages on a normal
non-import list, but should (I think) be unlimited on bulk import.
Conversion to unix newlines is required and is manual; doesn't
matter who does it.
Still prefer to do whole import at once especially if tricky; less
labor, also less l
On 4/14/2015 9:25 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
* I recommend doing the import all at once, rather than in
stages. Not for technical reasons, it just saves manual labor.
OK, I may do it in 2 stages, since 1/2 the archives are in mbox format
that can be imported instantly. The other half are in D
* I recommend doing the import all at once, rather than in
stages. Not for technical reasons, it just saves manual labor.
* Happy to make a tarball of the HTML after the import.
It will look like basic MHonArc output and cosmetically differ
quite a bit from what is served, because there is signifi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Matt Morgan wrote:
>> 2. Now the harder one. From Sep 1994 (inception) to Apr 2006, the lists
>> were hosted using L-Soft's LISTSERV software, which did not keep archives.
>> However, I have a complete set of all traffic from that time period, but
>> they are all
the date of the past appear
next to each item (e.g., after the author name)? E.g.,
Re: Search returning 404 Jeff Breidenbach 2013-05-31
since the date provides a useful additional context in the threads view.
Regards,
Shahrukh
___
Gos
First, it is very common and super easy to directly import from a
mailman (pipermail) archive. If the pipermail archive is publicly
online, just supply the URL to the support team.
The Mail Archive does not split digests back into individual messages.
That's way too scary. If a digest is presente
On 04/13/2015 12:57 AM, Shahrukh Merchant wrote:
I have two discussion lists on the Argentine Tango that are probably
going to be suspended going forward owing to lack of activity in the
face of many competing technologies in recent years, but that have a
treasure of information dating back fro
2014/1/6 Jeff Breidenbach :
> After investigation, this turned out to be an issue with an "X-No-Archive:
> Yes" header on the list itself.
Thanks a lot Jeff for your answer.
A point stays no clear (at least for us) : till the following message
no problem with the archiving
http://www.mail-archive
After investigation, this turned out to be an issue with an "X-No-Archive:
Yes" header
on the list itself.
Cheers,
Jeff
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.com
http://mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/gossip
Hi Jeff, *,
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> I've now had some time to spruce up the search feature. Amazing what
> progress Lucene has made in the last few years. Search is slightly
> faster now, there is less code on our end, and I found and fixed a couple of
> rare bug
I've now had some time to spruce up the search feature. Amazing what
progress Lucene has made in the last few years. Search is slightly
faster now, there is less code on our end, and I found and fixed a couple of
rare bugs involving HTML escaping.
What I can't do is reproduce your problem; it work
Thanks for the report. I found a stale lockfile in annou...@apache.org that
was gumming up the works (we update search indexes once a day, in
alphabetical order). I've cleared the problem and resumed indexing, which
should finish in a few hours. This error should have generated an alert, so
I am c
Thanks Jeff,
Search now does not return a 404 but it seems searching by date for
anything in June fails (unless I have the syntax wrong).
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=date:[20130601%20TO%2020130606]&l=maria-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
has no results, though the date view shoes message
Individual list search is very important. Thank you for reporting
the problem. This turned out to be a configuration mistake on the
webserver, involving the MultiViews configuration directive.
Search should be working now. Let us know if you see any
anomalies, and in the meantime we're looking into
An annoyance with the latest design is that hyperlinks to move to the
next thread message are never in the same place.
In the previous design, a message could be read and the key 'end' used
to navigate to the end of the page. After moving the mouse the the
hyperlink for the next message, never nee
Okay, so here's a quick status update. There are have been suggestions about
fonts. Font weight. Line spacing. Typeface. Line spacing is interesting,
a big design goal was to make more information available with less scrolling.
However, we've found several references that suggest 1.4 is good in ter
Hi,
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Speaking of fonts: After reading a while in the archive I find the
> line-spacing a little excessive - it is currently at 1.4
>
> Personally I find 1.2 much more comfortable for longer posts.
Deviating from the 1.2 norm also messes up glyphs that span lines, e.g.
h
Hi Christian,
> Speaking of fonts: After reading a while in the archive I find the
> line-spacing a little excessive - it is currently at 1.4
>
> Personally I find 1.2 much more comfortable for longer posts.
Thanks for pointing that out; I've just changed to 1.2, which I think
is this browser's
Hi Jeff, *,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback, keep it coming.
>
> Interesting screenshots. By the way, my everyday platform is
> also Ubuntu (10.04 and 12.04). So far I can't reproduce font
> problems with courier.
Speaking of fonts: After read
>What I dislike is that visited links are indistinguishable from non
>visited ones. The difference in color just is way too little.
I didn't notice this until you mentioned it. Now it is driving me crazy.
Thank you for the feedback.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
Thank you for the feedback, keep it coming.
Interesting screenshots. By the way, my everyday platform is
also Ubuntu (10.04 and 12.04). So far I can't reproduce font
problems with courier.
As for the ordering of font-family, that's a good question. Let
me check with graphic designer.
-Jeff
--
Hi Jeff, *,
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Jeff Marshall wrote:
> [...]
> We've been finding and fixing bugs with the new design the last few weeks
> but please alert us to all the edge cases we've neglected to find ourselves!
>
> Feedback and bug reports are desired.
I like the new design Al
Hi Jeff,
> Can you share your browser + operating system including
> version numbers? If it is not too hard, a screenshot of
> a message page as well? Do you know what your browser
> zoom level is set to?
Browser is Firefox 11.0+build1-0ubuntu0.10.10.2 on Ubuntu 10.10.
Using
http://www.mail-archi
Ralph:
Can you share your browser + operating system including
version numbers? If it is not too hard, a screenshot of
a message page as well? Do you know what your browser
zoom level is set to? Feel free to reply privately if you prefer.
http://www.whatismybrowser.com/
http://www.smartsheet.com/
Looks great to me. The message takes up a full 2/3 of the page, not just 1/3.
My only complaint, as one who has some vision issues, is that the font
isn't dark enough.
Personally, I *like* the white space. I *hate* clutter on my screen.
But then that could be due to my vision issues - too much no
Hi Jeff,
> We have been working on a new design for The Mail Archive message
> pages. The goal has been to visually bring you to the message content
> faster. The subject and message are right there at the very top left
> of the page now.
`left' being too true. :-) On a full HD monitor with m
Thanks everyone for public and private feedback. Graphical
summation here for the moment. Did I miss or misunderstand
anything?
http://mail-archive.com/feedback.png
>> Access keys should
>> also be defined to do similar.
>
>And that would be really nice. (but they should also be advertized,
>mayb
http://wics.cc and thanks for tuning in.
On Aug 28, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>> http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/318-mail-archive/38.htm
>
> Generally, I like it. The "18-01-2012, 10:51PM -0800" date is
> re-formatted compared to the
ow).
Like the removal of deadspace at the top (less scrolling), but dislike
the removal of the navigation from the top.
> Generally, I like it. The "18-01-2012, 10:51PM -0800" date is
> re-formatted compared to the original email so I'd like some say over
> how it's displa
Please - don't place ads in the middle of an archived email! They're
so annoying. I hate it when I see them in the middle of articles on
the web.
Yes, I realize advertising is necessary for revenue to keep a service
free, but there has to be a better way than breaking the train of
thought for the
Hi Jeff,
> http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/318-mail-archive/38.htm
Generally, I like it. The "18-01-2012, 10:51PM -0800" date is
re-formatted compared to the original email so I'd like some say over
how it's displayed to me, e.g. preferences in a cookie, or else a bette
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Okay, found the bug.
Great :-) & thanks for sharing the reason.
> [...] I have hopefully corrected the
> code, so there should be good data going forward.
yes, confirmed. Works again for new messages.
> Can you remind me which
Okay, found the bug.
On June 10th I made a change to deal with archives containing more
than one million messages. A piece of code had decided that one
million was a really big number and was starting to write scientific
notation to some internal log files. Unfortunately my change was
flawed and I
Hi Jeff,
> > Fair enough, I found how to have http://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html
> > subscribe something other than the envelope or header from address.
>
> If you think this would be useful for others, please consider sharing
> either here, or we can put in the http://mail-archive.com/faq.html if
> appr
> Fair enough, I found how to have http://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html subscribe
> something other than the envelope or header from address.
If you think this would be useful for others, please consider sharing either
here, or we can put in the http://mail-archive.com/faq.html if appropriate.
> I was a bi
Hi,
> I'm waiting for some subscription confirmations to turn up at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/archive@mail-archive.com/.
OK, I think it was the SPF softfail that's making the mailing list
discard my subscribe attempt.
$ dig +short mail-archive.com txt
"v=spf1 a ptr a:sea.gmane.org a:
Hi Jeff, *,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion
> about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you?
When shorter URLs will be possible, we'll adopt them, but it is not
critical for us.
Most imp
Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion
about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg12770.html
And a follow-up to let everyone know the blackout is complete. The web
site is back to normal, and all messages were processed today as usual.
Thanks to everyone that supported our decision to black out the website for
the day. Reading all the activity around SOPA/PIPA protests online today
conf
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 21:20 -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> The only change is all web pages are serving HTTP 503 (Service
> Temporarily Unavailable) for the next 24 hours. There is no disruption
> to email archival.
Thanks for the clarification. As a consultant to ISPs, I can assure you
that I
The only change is all web pages are serving HTTP 503 (Service Temporarily
Unavailable) for the next 24 hours. There is no disruption to email
archival.
We noticed at least one other email archival service (marc.info) is also
participating.
-Jeff
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 21:05 -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> The Mail Archive is now dark.
>
>
> We will be offline for 24 hours in protest of proposed US censorship
> laws.
While I absolutely agree with your decision to do so, I just wanted to
double check. Is the mail still being archived dur
A short follow-up: all incoming messages will still be received and processed.
Only web page serving will be affected during that period.
Thanks
Jeff
On Jan 16, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> The Mail Archive will be participating in SOPA Blackout Day. On January 18th,
> 2012
> Finally, one of the charter goals of Mail Archive, Inc. is to have fun
Mission accomplished.
http://www.airshipventures.com/sightings/1290/2012/01/08
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
Hello Horace, thanks for pointing that out. It's entirely possibly
(and likely) you are right about Postini's aggressiveness on the
tinyurls. I attempted to add a whitelist rule for the
vorte...@eskimo.com recipient address to bypass the Postini filtering;
can you please send a test message to yo
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>> [hash-URLs and search by message-ID not working]
>> > I assume the indexing is not running at their end for some reason.
>
> This should be completely resolved as of June 20th.
Yes, can confirm that it's fixed. Thanks a lot!
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> > I assume the indexing is not running at their end for some reason.
>
> That is exactly correct. If I run by hand it works fine, and that go
> link will resolve now. Still looking into why the cron job that kicks
> off indexing had troub
Hi e-letter,
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=merge&l=users%40global.libreoffice.org
> >
> > is more helpful. It didn't find
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/users@global.libreoffice.org/msg00181.html
> >
> > which contains "The problem I'm having with the merge cell function".
>
On 13/06/2011, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> e-letter wrote:
>> On 13/06/2011, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:11 PM, e-letter wrote:
>> > > Unable to use the search feature, e.g. search for "text" or "a"
>> > > returns 0 results, clearly incorrect.
>> >
>> > Works for me, from
e-letter wrote:
> On 13/06/2011, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:11 PM, e-letter wrote:
> > > Unable to use the search feature, e.g. search for "text" or "a"
> > > returns 0 results, clearly incorrect.
> >
> > Works for me, from both the home page and in an individual archiv
On 13/06/2011, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:11 PM, e-letter wrote:
>> Unable to use the search feature, e.g. search for "text" or "a"
>> returns 0 results, clearly incorrect.
>
> Works for me, from both the home page and in an individual archive.
> Can you please supply the
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:11 PM, e-letter wrote:
> Unable to use the search feature, e.g. search for "text" or "a"
> returns 0 results, clearly incorrect.
Works for me, from both the home page and in an individual archive.
Can you please supply the exact search URL that is giving trouble?
http:/
1 - 100 of 850 matches
Mail list logo
