Re: spam incident

1999-02-08 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
> Fair enough Note that we aren't completely unprotected from spam harvesters (see FAQ) and measurement of actual spam incidents are low and almost zero if you subtract out legacy harvests. Jeff

RE: spam incident

1999-02-08 Thread Derricutt, Mark
Jeff wrote: > I don't feel comfortable editing message bodies. Perhaps those > requiring additional privacy should consider access controls > (Such as password access or digital certificate access?) Fair enough, I also hold this opinion personally, but it was asked about by some members of the l

Re: spam incident

1999-02-08 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I don't feel comfortable editing message bodies. Perhaps those requiring additional privacy should consider access controls (Such as password access or digital certificate access?) Jeff

RE: spam incident

1999-02-08 Thread Derricutt, Mark
> 2) I have applied Mikael Yount's patch to MHonArc, which means that >email addresses will no longer appear in HTML comments. Is it also possible to strip/mangle email addresses mentioned in the body of emails, such as in .sig's? As these can also be trawled for spammers. Mark