On 19 Jul 2006 11:46:45 -0700, Jeff Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we
eliminate
one of them.
I think we should deprecate the RDF variant (e.g. remove it from the FAQ) then
actually remove the feature once we're sure nobo
I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we
eliminate one of them.
Thanks.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Marshall
Date: 7/18/06 10:37 am
To: gossip@jab.org
Subj: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss
We currently serve up two flavors of rss on The Mail Archive. Doe
More details for those that asked:
rdf and xml (I should've said xml, not rss) are both variations on RSS formats.
Each mailing list at The Mail Archive has both feed formats available. For
example, the gossip feeds are:
rdf:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@jab.org/maillist.rdf
xml:
http
