Just a quick update. Following contacts with him and his ISP, he has
removed the most obvious copied portions from his FAQ.
Jeff
Jeff Marshall wrote:
We thought it'd be a good idea to let users of The Mail Archive know
about a copycat site that we are dealing with. Back in April we found
that
I see two "bltech" archives. One contains only your test message. The other contains
five normal looking messages. The difference between the two archives is the address:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ - test archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ - actual
Just looking at the OOPS message makes me suspect I hit a kernel bug.
I ran a memory tester when I originally acquired the machine. It's
possible that some flaw has developed between now and then or we got
hit by a particularly bad cosmic ray.
It's funny, hardware generations change so quickly. I
BTW do you have ECC-enabled memory on that box? If not, it will probably
makes sense to run memtest86 (from www.memtest86.com) for at least few
hours on that box (hmm, this will at least be *planned* downtime :).
My own linux kernel testing experience tells that the first thing to do
after kern
Send a copy of a message with full headers to me. I will
examine it some time late next week.
-Jeff
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 11:14, a.blanch wrote:
> Hello...
>
> In first place, pardon for my terrible English (product of an automatic translator).
>I know that there have been difficulties in the
This intermittant bug was introduced during the recent performance
upgrade. (I made a bogus assumption about the cron environment).
Now fixed. Thanks for the report.
Jeff
---
>The front page of www.mail-archive.com is claiming no lists are archived
>though it still has approximately the me
