> I agree, and David pointed it out originally. Are you implicitly saying
> it shouldn't and won't?
I'm uncomfortable with the idea of mucking with the subject line, for
several reasons (parsing chanllenges, unclear etiquette,
internationalization, ...) I would feel a more comfortable if the pra
Hi Jeff,
> > When you add prefixing the subject with "Re: " [...]
>
> The Mail Archive doesn't add any prefixing.
I agree, and David pointed it out originally. Are you implicitly saying
it shouldn't and won't?
Cheers,
Ralph.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
> When you add prefixing the subject with "Re: " [...]
The Mail Archive doesn't add any prefixing.
So I've tried a few more systems (mostly Apple) and none of them are
working. That means either I screwed up, or mail user agents don't
support this feature, or both. Can a few volunteers use the r
Hi Jeff,
> Based on David's request, I've put together preliminary support for
> In-Reply-To to help with threading.
When you add prefixing the subject with "Re: " can you strip off any
existing chain of Re and FW first, e.g. s/^(?:(?:re|fw):\s*)*/Re: /i
Cheers,
Ralph.
--
To unsubscribe, se
Hi all,
I'm moving this discussion to gossip because it is of general
interest. There are about 1000 uses of The Mail Archive's reply
feature every day. Based on David's request, I've put together
preliminary support for In-Reply-To to help with threading. You can
see it in action with curl and I'
