Hi Jeff,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Okay, found the bug.
Great :-) & thanks for sharing the reason.
> [...] I have hopefully corrected the
> code, so there should be good data going forward.
yes, confirmed. Works again for new messages.
> Can you remind me which
Okay, found the bug.
On June 10th I made a change to deal with archives containing more
than one million messages. A piece of code had decided that one
million was a really big number and was starting to write scientific
notation to some internal log files. Unfortunately my change was
flawed and I
Hi Jeff, *,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion
> about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you?
When shorter URLs will be possible, we'll adopt them, but it is not
critical for us.
Most imp
Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion
about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg12770.html
Hi Jeff, *,
Is a cronjob stuck? It seems that the archived-at links don't work for
messages sent since 2012-06-10.
Old links work, but new ones give a 404...
ciao
Christian
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
