On 19 Jul 2006 11:46:45 -0700, Jeff Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we
eliminate
one of them.
I think we should deprecate the RDF variant (e.g. remove it from the FAQ) then
actually remove the feature once we're sure nobo
I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we
eliminate one of them.
Thanks.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Marshall
Date: 7/18/06 10:37 am
To: gossip@jab.org
Subj: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss
We currently serve up two flavors of rss on The Mail Archive
Jeff Marshall
Date: 7/18/06 10:37 am
To: gossip@jab.org
Subj: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss
We currently serve up two flavors of rss on The Mail Archive. Does anybody
have a strong preference on which one they use? Does it matter to you? Are
they virtually interchangeable?
We're cons
We currently serve up two flavors of rss on The Mail Archive. Does anybody
have a strong preference on which one they use? Does it matter to you? Are
they virtually interchangeable?
We're considering dropping one.
Thanks.
Jeff
___
Discussion list
