On March 29, 2005 at 18:56, John Van Essen wrote:
> But if mhonarc reflows long lines in normal plain text and uses
> (when it could have allowed it to flow), it seems to be consistent to do
> the same with (supposedly) flowed text.
The message cited did not have very long lines, at least the li
On March 29, 2005 at 13:26, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> >If someone can provide me a raw email message illustrating the
> >problem, I can try an look at it.
>
> I've sent the raw message to Earl. In any case, the trial
> configuration change on the rsync mailing list will continue.
It looks like a
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On March 27, 2005 at 12:43, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
>> > d) use the m2h_text_plain::filter disableflowed setting
>>
>> Ok. I've disabled reflow on rsync@lists.samba.org as a guinea pig.
>> John, please monitor new messages to the list
>If someone can provide me a raw email message illustrating the
>problem, I can try an look at it.
I've sent the raw message to Earl. In any case, the trial
configuration change on the rsync mailing list will continue.
Cheers,
Jeff
___
Discussion list
On March 27, 2005 at 12:43, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> > d) use the m2h_text_plain::filter disableflowed setting
>
> Ok. I've disabled reflow on rsync@lists.samba.org as a guinea pig.
> John, please monitor new messages to the list for a few weeks and let
> me know how it works out. If there are n
> d) use the m2h_text_plain::filter disableflowed setting
Ok. I've disabled reflow on rsync@lists.samba.org as a guinea pig.
John, please monitor new messages to the list for a few weeks and let
me know how it works out. If there are no bad side effects, we can
consider a site-wide configuration
Jeff,
I'm a little slow on the reply...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
> Interesting, I'd never noticed that before. I'm looking at the raw
> email received by The Mail Archive (note to self, it is #5525) and am
> wondering why mhonarc decided not to use the usual pre tag. I thi
Interesting, I'd never noticed that before. I'm looking at the raw
email received by The Mail Archive (note to self, it is #5525) and am
wondering why mhonarc decided not to use the usual pre tag. I think it
is probably because the Content-Type on the message is asking for
reflow.
Content-Type:
In some cases, consecutive spaces that are present in a plain text email
(as shown in the mail-archive html source) are not displayed because they
are within a tt container (instead of a pre container) and therefore get
condensed to a single space when rendered.
For an example, see:
http://www.
