Re: [Gossip] Beta of new design for The Mail Archive

2004-07-25 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
One thing that has always bugged me (ever so slightly) is that URLs like this: http://unagi.mail-archive.com:8080/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg1.html ...get mangled by the Email address hiding logic. I know, strictly speaking that is not even a legal URL until I replace "@" by "%40". But most lin

Re: [Gossip] Beta of new design for The Mail Archive

2004-07-25 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Jeff Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is not a functional overhaul; for the most part, it is > cosmetic. We are switching to a full CSS design which will gives us > all (Jeff and I, as well as all of you soon) a lot of flexibility. Very pretty! As long as you are tinkering with the HT

Re: [Gossip] question - confirm/response

2004-07-01 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Heath Raftery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeff, > > On 01/07/2004, at 4:11 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > > - a non-admin can add a public list more easily > > I think it should be an admin that makes the decision to take their > list archives public. If the admin allows unmoderated subscript

Re: [Gossip] Re: oodles of spam lists at Mail-Archive.com?

2003-11-24 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (My last word due to Jeff's hint about terminating the thread) (Ditto. I will restrict my comments to technical issues.) > On idealogical grounds, I have problems with this. Filtering can be > done, but auto-deletion must not be done w/o user's consent.

Re: [Gossip] Re: oodles of spam lists at Mail-Archive.com?

2003-11-21 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
(Hm. I wonder how far off topic we can go before Jeff pulls the plug on us.) Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Politics and democracy. Again, you must look beyond money. In the end, everything is economics. But I do not advocate kicking poor people off of the Net. I do advocate making

Re: [Gossip] Re: oodles of spam lists at Mail-Archive.com?

2003-11-21 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ADSL and cable are very economical for ISPs and small organizations > to get connected to the Net. Some would argue that spam exists precisely because running a mail server is so economical. Perhaps it should be more expensive. Small ISPs and organization

Re: [Gossip] Re: oodles of spam lists at Mail-Archive.com?

2003-11-20 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Sleep) writes: > Help me out here please! How 'screwed'? I am not running an open > relay according to testing via > http://www.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest. and no spam has ever > emanated from my SMTP server (212.47.80.97 if anyone wants to try > their luck). That IP addr

Re: [Gossip] Re: oodles of spam lists at Mail-Archive.com?

2003-11-20 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Jeff Breidenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It more or less matches Marc Merlin's setup for SourceForge > discussed here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/msg01672.html So you are using the *.mail-abuse.org lists? Out of curiosity, how much do pay to use them? An

Re: [Gossip] Re: oodles of spam lists at Mail-Archive.com?

2003-11-19 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Jeff Breidenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Comments and ideas appreciated. Warning: I am old-fashioned; I believe in filtering on source, not content. Your services are special. Presumably, all of the mail for any particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively small col

[Gossip] My own messages not showing up on my list

2003-07-06 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Hi. Last night I added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to a mailing list I manage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I then proceeded to "bounce" a bunch of old messages into the archive. This mostly worked, but several of my own messages never showed up in the archive. Another message I sent today did not show up, either