(12/10/2010 02:31 PM), Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
>> IIRC, the source of this discussion was that a URL that
>> uses an @ was getting munged. If this is not desired,
>> the author can use %40 in the URL and this will bypass
>> the filtering done by M-A.
>
> Shure, we will succeed to convince all
Breidenbach wrote:
> Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] still subscribed to the wget list?
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A reader has pointed out that the latest mail archived for Wget at
> mail-archive.com is dated 2008-04-07. I did see that th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> To: gossip@jab.org
> Subject: Wget archives end in early April.
>
>
>> A reader has pointed out that the latest mail archived for Wget at
>> mail-archive.com is dated 2008-04-07. I did see that there was some
>> recent downt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> To: gossip@jab.org
> Subject: Wget archives end in early April.
>
>
>> A reader has pointed out that the latest mail archived for Wget at
>> mail-archive.com is dated 2008-04-07. I did see that there was some
>> recent downt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A reader has pointed out that the latest mail archived for Wget at
mail-archive.com is dated 2008-04-07. I did see that there was some
recent downtime, but I don't think that would explain why the archive
has not been updated for nearly two months.
(N
