Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-website] Archived-At: links not working since May 31th?

edrich Strohmaier An: webs...@libreoffice.org Hi Christian Lohmaier, *, Christian Lohmaier schrieb: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Friedrich Strohmaier > wrote: >> I noticed the "Archived-At:" header tags don't work since 31 May >> 2011 >> for exampl

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Christian, *, Christian Lohmaier schrieb: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier > wrote: [..] >> The initial posting's broken link remains broken: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html > I personally

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Jeff, *, Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: >> ((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp) >Tested and live. Thanks guys. The initial posting's broken link remains broken: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html Does this mean that's true fo

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Jeff, *, Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: > There are two cases that are very common and handled poorly. One > is an http hyperlink to mail-archive.com as we've been discussing. > The other is a a mailto hyperlink. These are correctly obfuscated, > but end up as a broken link. Better to not have a l

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Earl, *, Did You read the mails? Earl Hood schrieb: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: >>> Once can avoid the munging on the authoring side be URL escaping >>> the @ character with %40 >> shure harvesters don't know the trick?

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Earl, *, Earl Hood schrieb: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: >>> You could also add the prefix to the method, as alternative to the >>> already existing cid case. >>> ((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Christian, *, Christian Lohmaier schrieb: [...] > I had a quick look at MHonArc sources and there are two possible > points where the behavriour can be tweaked. > One is the expression that identifies email-addresses in lib/mhinit.pl [.. cleaning classes, running to a mirror to look whether

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Christian, *, long time no see .. ;o)) Christian Lohmaier schrieb: >On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier > wrote: >> Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: >> [..] >>> http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html >>> [..]

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi Jeff, *, Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: [..] > Your feature request is valid and if you are feeling eager, feel free > to send in a patch. Otherwise we'll get to it when inspiration > strikes (and I have to warn you, inspiration can be rather slow to > strike sometimes...). I know of :o)). > htt

Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

Hi folks, I'm from LibreOffice community and noticed that links in archived mails containing an "@" are screwed up, assuming to hide an emailadress. This isn't a good thing, because especially links pointing to other mail-archive.com Mails are broken. see for example: http://www.mail-archive.com/