Re: [Gossip] archive not updated for board-disc...@documentfoundation.org mailinglist

2015-06-30 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > The spam filtering service we use (SpamHero) quarantined that message along > with some others. I've released the messages from quarantine and also > adjusted > the whitelist to hopefully reduce or prevent this from happening in t

[Gossip] archive not updated for board-disc...@documentfoundation.org mailinglist

2015-06-30 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, seems that some indexing got stuck for the aforementioned list http://www.mail-archive.com/board-discuss@documentfoundation.org/maillist.html I confirmed that arch...@mail-archive.com is still subscribed, and mail is sent and accepted: e.g. most recent mail: Jun 30 10:14:41 bilbo2 po

Re: Archived-At links - another non-working example

2013-09-04 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > I've now had some time to spruce up the search feature. Amazing what > progress Lucene has made in the last few years. Search is slightly > faster now, there is less code on our end, and I found and fixed a couple of > rare bug

Archived-At links - another non-working example

2013-07-30 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, we stumbled across another non-working archive-link - the targeted message is in the archive, and newer and older messages are accessible using the hash-URLs. The message in question is: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@de.libreoffice.org/msg15830.html and the corresponding, non-wo

Re: New look to Mail Archive message pages

2012-12-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Thank you for the feedback, keep it coming. > > Interesting screenshots. By the way, my everyday platform is > also Ubuntu (10.04 and 12.04). So far I can't reproduce font > problems with courier. Speaking of fonts: After read

Re: New look to Mail Archive message pages

2012-11-28 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Jeff Marshall wrote: > [...] > We've been finding and fixing bugs with the new design the last few weeks > but please alert us to all the edge cases we've neglected to find ourselves! > > Feedback and bug reports are desired. I like the new design Al

Re: site design

2012-08-28 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > >> http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/318-mail-archive/38.htm Not much of a friend of displaying the ads within the message as if the poster had added the image (but that's not different compared to as it is now). Like the remov

Re: Archived-At links for new mails not working anymore (since June-10)

2012-07-04 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Okay, found the bug. Great :-) & thanks for sharing the reason. > [...] I have hopefully corrected the > code, so there should be good data going forward. yes, confirmed. Works again for new messages. > Can you remind me which

Re: Archived-At links for new mails not working anymore (since June-10)

2012-06-26 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion > about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you? When shorter URLs will be possible, we'll adopt them, but it is not critical for us. Most imp

Archived-At links for new mails not working anymore (since June-10)

2012-06-25 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, Is a cronjob stuck? It seems that the archived-at links don't work for messages sent since 2012-06-10. Old links work, but new ones give a 404... ciao Christian -- To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.

Re: Re: [libreoffice-website] Archived-At: links not working since May 31th?

2011-06-27 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: >> [hash-URLs and search by message-ID not working] >>  > I assume the indexing is not running at their end for some reason. > > This should be completely resolved as of June 20th. Yes, can confirm that it's fixed. Thanks a lot!

What happened to search? (only google custom search with crippled possibilities?)

2011-02-12 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, what I always liked about mail-archive.com was its powerful search, but it seems it has been replaced by a google search, that doesn't support the lucene parameters anymore. The first change to the worse since I've been using mail-archive.com So if this is a permanent change (the message b

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-12 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > Hi Jeff, *, > > Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: > >>> ((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp) > >>Tested and live. Thanks guys. Thanks a lot! > The initial posting's broken link remains broken: > http://w

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Friedrich, *; On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > > long time no see .. ;o)) :-) > Christian Lohmaier schrieb: >>On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier > [...] > in this case - I fear isn't the right thing to do or >

Re: Urls containing "@" screwed up in archived Mails

2010-12-10 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Friedrich, *, On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > Jeff Breidenbach schrieb: > > [..] > >> http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html > >> >> $orig_address = $_; >> $address = lc($orig_address); >> if ($ENV{'MAILLIST'} eq $address) { >>    #

Re: Problem with search by message-id / Archived-At hashes

2010-11-10 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > You found a bug. In The Mail Archive's hash calculation, there is an > incorrect urlib.unquote run on the message id. This is escaping the minus > sign, and therefore calculating based on an incorrect message id. Ah, so the smal

Problem with search by message-id / Archived-At hashes

2010-11-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, I was trying to add the http://go.mai-archive.com/ URLs for a mailing list, and am now facing problem, that some messages are not reachable using those computed URLs. While having a closer look (on that small dataset), the problematic messages cannot be found by message-ID either. On

Mails with From: different from Sender not allowed

2010-11-07 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, I was quite surprised fo find out that my messages don't make it to the gossip list, despite I'm receiving all the mails from others. Turns out that the gossip list doesn't look for from, but the real sender (i.e. you cannot send from alternate addresses setup in gmail, but have to su

from different from sender not allowed

2010-11-07 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, *, I was quite surprised fo find out that my messages don't make it to the gossip list, despite I'm receiving all the mails from others. Turns out that the gossip list doesn't look for from, but the real sender (i.e. you cannot send from alternate addresses setup in gmail, but have to su

Re: Moving a list with outdated list:post header possible? ([EMAIL PROTECTED] to dev@website.openoffice.org)

2006-12-29 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jeff, On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 02:32:18PM -0500, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > You are right, list-post tends to be the dominant header for > the M-A sorting engine. It is possible to move a migrate a list > archive, but it is kind of manual so you have to ask really nicely. I'll try my best. > [.

Moving a list with outdated list:post header possible? ([EMAIL PROTECTED] to dev@website.openoffice.org)

2006-12-15 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, Unfortunately the dev@website.openoffice.org is archived as website-dev@openoffice.org This probably is due to the list-post: header that lists the ancient address from the beginnings of the project. I'd like to get some advise on how that list could be moved to dev@website.openoffice.org