Oops, sorry for the more-or-less duplicate message. The extra factor
of 2 in time is because the temporary files are turning out twice as
big as I was expecting. Earl, good suggestion, and no we haven't
explored it (yet).
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
I was doing some experiments today, and managed to briefly knock over
a server in the process. I looked at searching multiple indexes
(Lucene's MultiSearcher) and merging
(IndexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize). The former is unusably slow. The
latter seems to be on track for about 6 hours if the desti
>Perhaps it's time for us to revisit [Lucene for site-wide search]
A few weeks ago I tested Lucene's ability to search across multiple
indexes (MultiSearcher) and it is hopelessly slow; queries take 5
seconds across just a few hundred indexes.
Right now I'm trying index merging (addIndexesNoOptim
HI Christian.
Actually, we've been using Google's search for our front-page site-wide
search for years. Our internally-developed Lucene search has always been on
the individual lists and still is. So we've never had Lucene search
parameter controls on that site-wide search.
The only change that
Hi *,
what I always liked about mail-archive.com was its powerful search,
but it seems it has been replaced by a google search, that doesn't
support the lucene parameters anymore.
The first change to the worse since I've been using mail-archive.com
So if this is a permanent change (the message b
