Re: [Gossip] search going ok

2006-09-27 Thread Earl Hood
On September 27, 2006 at 17:44, Olly Betts wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 03:16:06PM -0700, Jeff Marshall wrote: > > In major search engines like Google and Yahoo, this relevance ordering > > makes the most sense. > > Google Groups and Google News both offer a choice of "date" or > "relevance"

[Gossip] Re: Squid2.6s3 tranparently access

2006-09-27 Thread robin rocamora
test only Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ___ Discussion list for The Mail Archive Gossip@jab.org http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip

Re: [Gossip] search going ok

2006-09-27 Thread Olly Betts
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 03:16:06PM -0700, Jeff Marshall wrote: > In major search engines like Google and Yahoo, this relevance ordering > makes the most sense. Google Groups and Google News both offer a choice of "date" or "relevance" (date being "most recent first"). > Perhaps in our specialize

Re: [Gossip] search going ok

2006-09-27 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Hi Mac, Wow, when you dive in, you dive in deep! By the way, I have not read the book, but I have looked at the FAQ. 1) It seems as though the Lucene search engine (LSE) deals with indexes, rather than the email messages. Is that correct? Ahead of time, Lucene reads email messages to produce

Re: [Gossip] search going ok

2006-09-27 Thread Mac Oglesby
Jeff, I've spent some time (several hours, in fact -- I'm a little slow) poking about on the Lucene site and its links in an attempt to understand more about the search process. I even downloaded and tried to read the two sample chapters from "Lucene in Action." That book certainly wasn't wr