(Mail Archive admin jumping in)
We don't want to post back to lists via the archive@mail-archive.com address.
Spamming would be too easy and many lists want to have controlled
subscriber/poster lists. We like the fact that no mail heads outbound from our
server.
Jeff Marshall
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
I think that even with two buttons you'd make casual surfers (people
referred from Google, say) believe they can reply to the list when they
can't.
Can't they? The archive is subscribed to the list. So the archive would be
able to send messages to
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Dan Temple wrote:
I had imagined two buttons: "Reply" and "Reply List".
I think that even with two buttons you'd make casual surfers (people
referred from Google, say) believe they can reply to the list when they
can't.
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepag
I had imagined two buttons: "Reply" and "Reply List".
It does depend on how the list is used, of course, but the idea is convenience
for those list users who want to take part, but use a web interface to browse
the discussion instead of getting all the mail.
regards,
/Dan
Stephen Turner wro
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Dan Temple wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering why the Reply button on mail-archive only generates a To:
address to the previous mails originator.
Mostly, one wants replies to cc: the list address (at least on the lists I
deal with). Could this go on the feature wish-list?
W
Hi,
I was wondering why the Reply button on mail-archive only generates a To:
address to the previous mails originator.
Mostly, one wants replies to cc: the list address (at least on the lists I
deal with). Could this go on the feature wish-list?
Ideally, the mail would also have the Refere
