>Is it archived correctly only by a hapy accident or is the new header
>List-id: officially supported by the mail-archive.com?
Happy accident. We make good use of List-Post: from RFC 2369 but are
still evaluating the List-Id: header. I'm not sure how I feel about
RFC2919 and its intent of separa
On June 23, 2004 at 09:45, Jeff Marshall wrote:
> Your mailing list server is now sending all of the List headers (see RFC=
> 2369 at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2369.html and RFC 2919 at =20=
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2919.html), which is great. The particular =
> header we've been supporti
Your mailing list server is now sending all of the List headers (see RFC 2369 at
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2369.html and RFC 2919 at
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2919.html), which is great. The particular header we've
been supporting to sort the messages is the List-Post header. Although we
Hello,
recently my mailing-list server stopped addind x-mailing-list: headers
to the emails, but the mail-archive seems to archive the emails sent to
different addresses to the same list (correctly). Instead, the list
server is adding the new header List-id:
F.x. the email
http://www.mail-archi
