Tony Sleep wrote:
as the little guy can always use his ISP's
mail server.
If only it was that easy!
How many subscribers do you have? If it's under 1,
maybe pair.com's service would do.
http://www.pair.com/pair/pairlist/
I've been using them for some low volume stuff for years,
and I suspect t
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> as the little guy can always use his ISP's
> mail server.
If only it was that easy!
c.1998 I set up the filmscanners list using local s/w sending BCC through
my domain host/ISP, cix.co.uk.
c.1999 they asked me to make other arrangements as mail volume was
contri
(Hm. I wonder how far off topic we can go before Jeff pulls the plug
on us.)
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Politics and democracy. Again, you must look beyond money.
In the end, everything is economics.
But I do not advocate kicking poor people off of the Net. I do
advocate making
On November 21, 2003 at 10:20, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Some would argue that spam exists precisely because running a mail
> > server is so economical. Perhaps it should be more expensive.
> >
> > Small ISPs and organizations can relay mail via their DSL provider's
> > servers, just like individuals
(Note, do not cc me on messages sent to the list. My action of replying
to list messages assumed I am subscribed.)
On November 21, 2003 at 12:13, "Patrick J. LoPresti" wrote:
> > ADSL and cable are very economical for ISPs and small organizations
> > to get connected to the Net.
>
> Some would
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> The solution? Block all cable/DSL/dialup address ranges. (This is
> what dialups.easynet.nl is for.) Done.
Thanks for the explanation, Pat. Indeed I am running a POP proxy, but send
SMTP direct via MX record instead of via my ADSL provider's SMTP.
The reason
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ADSL and cable are very economical for ISPs and small organizations
to get connected to the Net.
Some would argue that spam exists precisely because running a mail
server is so economical. Perhaps it should be more expensive.
Sma
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ADSL and cable are very economical for ISPs and small organizations
> to get connected to the Net.
Some would argue that spam exists precisely because running a mail
server is so economical. Perhaps it should be more expensive.
Small ISPs and organization
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:09:37PM -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> In theory, I don't have to pay anything because Mail-Archive is a
> hobby project.
Good luck with trying to get a hobbyist subscription... I tried about 18
months ago, and despite asking MAPS repeatedly, they never set it up for
m
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 08:58, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Well, it's not quite that bad. I can't computationally afford to put
> SpamAssassin on the existing primary server.
I am running a Celeron 1200 with 256 MB RAM and a single IDE disk. The machine
is running Suse Linux 8.1 with sendmai
10 matches
Mail list logo
