On June 22, 2002 at 19:01, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> > Should there be message expiration [?]
>
> Yeah, I think we've hit the runaway success point where it is
> helpful. I think I am going to limit maximum archive size to a
> few thousand messages after the new hardware is in place and there
Earl is correct. MHonArc computation is not the bottleneck, disk
space is. Latency is still under 24 hours if things run at full tilt,
but that doesn't happen when your disk I/O system is spending
ages searching for the few free inodes amongst the billions already
used.
We do use a lot of CPU --
On June 22, 2002 at 15:48, "William J. Kammerer" wrote:
> As a side issue, are you beginning to wonder whether MHonArc is really
> suited for a massively scalable system of mail archiving such as yours?
> It seems to me that over 99% of all e-mail received by the Mail Archive
> will never be look
Thanks for your assurance that the "missing" messages are not
permanently lost. Again, many thanks for your service.
As a side issue, are you beginning to wonder whether MHonArc is really
suited for a massively scalable system of mail archiving such as yours?
It seems to me that over 99% of all
I have them all sitting in a storage location.
So they are not lost. No esitmate on how long they
will sit, though.
-Jeff
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 07:22, William J. Kammerer wrote:
> Does this mean the messages from the 17th are lost forever? Or will
> they will magically appear sometime when you'
Does this mean the messages from the 17th are lost forever? Or will
they will magically appear sometime when you've able to retrieve them?
William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Breidenbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William J. Kammerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
