Re: tests do not work with gpg 2.1

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:21:33PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > I'm not sure if the most expedient path is trying to convince gpg > developers that it's a bug, or if there is some workaround (like > "--passphrase-file /dev/null" or something). > > I've been using the patch below to test, and am temp

Re: tests do not work with gpg 2.1

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:55:31PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > That private-keys directory is from the first run of gpg2.1 on a pre-2.1 > GPGHOME. It converts the old secring db to that new dir of entries and > uses that instead. Thanks for untangling this. As I mentioned elsewhere in the th

Re: tests do not work with gpg 2.1

Jeff King schrieb am 28.11.2014 um 17:50: > [updated subject, as this is not specific to the v2.2.0 release at all] > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> Are you running gnome_keyring_deamon by any chance? It think it runs by >> default in Gnome, claims to off

tests do not work with gpg 2.1

[updated subject, as this is not specific to the v2.2.0 release at all] On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Are you running gnome_keyring_deamon by any chance? It think it runs by > default in Gnome, claims to offer gpg_agent functionality but does not > seem to do