On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
> Having said all that, this illustrates the root cause of different
> behaviours better, but it is harder to reason about than simply
> changing the variable name used in this shell function. POSIX reads
> a bit f
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Both bash and dash seem to run the func1 in the downstream of the
> pipe in a separate process, and $name used in "func2 again" is not
> affected. But it seems that ksh93 behaves differently (I do not
> have access to ksh88).
>
> An obvious workaround is to replace your
Armin Kunaschik writes:
> Essentially it's working like this:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> func1() {
> name=${1}
> echo "func1 name=$name"
> }
>
> func2() {
> name=${1}
> echo "func2 name=$name"
> func1 "ordered-$name"
> echo "func2 again name=$name"
> }
>
Hello,
I see 3 test failures in t4202:
expecting success:
test_patch_id_file_order irrelevant --stable --stable
Already on 'same'
cmp: cannot open patch-id_ordered-ordered-order---stable-irrelevant
not ok 7 - file order is irrelevant with --stable
#
# test_patch_id_file_ord
4 matches
Mail list logo
