Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Rerolling sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after 2.7

Stefan Beller writes: > I am sending out a new version for replacing sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for > the time after the 2.7 release. > > * Dropped the patch, which introduces xread_nonblock > * strbuf_read_once uses xread now. This is safe as we poll before using > strbu

[PATCHv2 0/7] Rerolling sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after 2.7

with the interdiff below: diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h index 87456a3..8e39867 100644 --- a/git-compat-util.h +++ b/git-compat-util.h @@ -723,7 +723,6 @@ extern void *xmmap(void *start, size_t length, int prot, int flags, int fd, off_ extern void *xmmap_gently(void *start, s

[PATCHv2 0/7] Rerolling sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after 2.7

I am sending out a new version for replacing sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after the 2.7 release. * Dropped the patch, which introduces xread_nonblock * strbuf_read_once uses xread now. This is safe as we poll before using strbuf_read_once, so we know we won't stall. * hav

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Rerolling sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after 2.7

Johannes Sixt writes: > Am 14.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Stefan Beller: >> I am sending out a new version for replacing sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for >> the time after the 2.7 release. >> >> The content are >> * all patches as in the branch sb/submodule-pa

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Rerolling sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after 2.7

Am 14.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Stefan Beller: I am sending out a new version for replacing sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after the 2.7 release. The content are * all patches as in the branch sb/submodule-parallel-fetch * inlcuding the fixups as suggested by Hannes, * write a

[PATCH 0/8] Rerolling sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after 2.7

I am sending out a new version for replacing sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after the 2.7 release. The content are * all patches as in the branch sb/submodule-parallel-fetch * inlcuding the fixups as suggested by Hannes, * write a message to the debug log for better testing and

Re: sb/submodule-parallel-fetch,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote: >>> >>> Generally, I'm already quite satisfied with the state of the >>> infrastructure at the tip of the branch. >> >> I was about the rework the patch serie

Re: sb/submodule-parallel-fetch, was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2015, #03; Thu, 10)

Am 11.12.2015 um 23:52 schrieb Stefan Beller: If you don't mind I'll split your patch into chunks and squash these where appropriate I don't mind at all; please pick what you like. -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord..

Re: sb/submodule-parallel-fetch,

Stefan Beller writes: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> >> Generally, I'm already quite satisfied with the state of the >> infrastructure at the tip of the branch. > > I was about the rework the patch series. OK. I think the very early part of the series, up to 8fc3f2e

Re: sb/submodule-parallel-fetch, was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2015, #03; Thu, 10)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > Generally, I'm already quite satisfied with the state of the > infrastructure at the tip of the branch. > I was about the rework the patch series. > Nevertheless, I have a few niggles. If you don't mind I'll split your patch into chunks

sb/submodule-parallel-fetch, was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2015, #03; Thu, 10)

Am 11.12.2015 um 00:55 schrieb Stefan Beller: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Stefan Beller writes: >> >>>> * sb/submodule-parallel-fetch (2015-11-24) 17 commits >>>> ... >>> >>> I assume you plan on mergin