On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:06:17, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>On 02/19/2014 11:58 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> Looking at it from one more angle, `git fetch r --tags` and
>> `git push r --tags` is now no longer symmetric :(
>
>I'm glad you brought this up, because I didn't really think about
>whether
On 02/19/2014 11:58 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 2014-02-19 21:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jan Engelhardt writes:
>>> The release notes for 1.9.0 read:
>>>
* The "--tags" option to "git fetch" no longer tells the command to
fetch _only_ the tags. It instead fetches tags _i
On Thursday 2014-02-20 00:40, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Looking at it from one more angle, `git fetch r --tags` and
>`git push r --tags` is now no longer symmetric :(
>
>
>I would have loved to hear such comments _during_ the discussion,
On Wednesday 2014-02-19 21:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt writes:
>> The release notes for 1.9.0 read:
>>
>>> * The "--tags" option to "git fetch" no longer tells the command to
>>> fetch _only_ the tags. It instead fetches tags _in addition to_
>>> what are fetched by the same com
Jan Engelhardt writes:
> The release notes for 1.9.0 read:
>
>> * The "--tags" option to "git fetch" no longer tells the command to
>> fetch _only_ the tags. It instead fetches tags _in addition to_
>> what are fetched by the same command line without the option.
>
> I think the release notes
Greetings.
The release notes for 1.9.0 read:
> * The "--tags" option to "git fetch" no longer tells the command to
> fetch _only_ the tags. It instead fetches tags _in addition to_
> what are fetched by the same command line without the option.
I think the release notes should also say -- l
6 matches
Mail list logo
