Hi Matwey,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2018-01-09 16:25 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> > Hi Matwey,
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> >
> >> 2018-01-08 22:36 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin
> >> :
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wro
2018-01-09 16:25 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> Hi Matwey,
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>
>> 2018-01-08 22:36 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
>> >
>> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2018-01-08 19:32 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin
>> >> :
>> >> >
>>
Hi Matwey,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2018-01-08 22:36 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> >
> >> 2018-01-08 19:32 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin
> >> :
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> >> >
> >>
2018-01-08 22:36 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> Hi Matwey,
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>
>> 2018-01-08 19:32 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
>> >
>> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2018-01-08 17:42 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov :
>> >> > 2018-01-08
Hi Matwey,
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2018-01-08 19:32 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> >
> >> 2018-01-08 17:42 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov :
> >> > 2018-01-08 16:56 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin
> >> > :
> >> >> Hi Mat
2018-01-08 19:32 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>
>> 2018-01-08 17:42 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov :
>> > 2018-01-08 16:56 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin
>> > :
>> >> Hi Matwey,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>> >>
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2018-01-08 17:42 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov :
> > 2018-01-08 16:56 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> >> Hi Matwey,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think that rebase preserve-merges algorithm needs further
>
2018-01-08 17:42 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov :
> 2018-01-08 16:56 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
>> Hi Matwey,
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>>
>>> I think that rebase preserve-merges algorithm needs further
>>> improvements. Probably, you already know it.
>>
>> Yes. preserv
2018-01-08 16:56 GMT+03:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> Hi Matwey,
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>
>> I think that rebase preserve-merges algorithm needs further
>> improvements. Probably, you already know it.
>
> Yes. preserve-merges is a fundamentally flawed design.
>
> Please have
Hi Matwey,
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> I think that rebase preserve-merges algorithm needs further
> improvements. Probably, you already know it.
Yes. preserve-merges is a fundamentally flawed design.
Please have a look here:
https://github.com/git/git/pull/447
Sin
Hello,
I think that rebase preserve-merges algorithm needs further
improvements. Probably, you already know it.
I was playing with rebasing linux kernel tree and found that rebase
preserve-merges works in counterintuitive way while handling
merge-commits. I don't want to discuss arising merge con
11 matches
Mail list logo