Eugene Sajine writes:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Eugene Sajine writes:
>>
>>> I think the best variant would be to do something like:
>>>
>>> $ git pull --rebase /refs/heads/*:/refs/heads/*
>>> $ git push origin /refs/heads/*:/refs/heads/*
>>
>> You perhaps meant
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eugene Sajine writes:
>
>> I think the best variant would be to do something like:
>>
>> $ git pull --rebase /refs/heads/*:/refs/heads/*
>> $ git push origin /refs/heads/*:/refs/heads/*
>
> You perhaps meant "worst" not "best" here. From th
Eugene Sajine writes:
> I think the best variant would be to do something like:
>
> $ git pull --rebase /refs/heads/*:/refs/heads/*
> $ git push origin /refs/heads/*:/refs/heads/*
You perhaps meant "worst" not "best" here. From the point of view
of people who have pushed into the "origin" repos
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Eugene Sajine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody please advise about how to address the following:
>
> I have a bare repo (bareA) on one server in network1 and i have a
> mirror of it on another server (bareB) in network2
> BareB is updated periodically - no problem h
4 matches
Mail list logo
