Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:43:39AM -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> ...
> More seriously, I agree that re-wording the question is a reasonable
> thing to do. I do not use send-email, either, so I don't have a strong
> opinion on it. The suggestions you made:
>
>> How about "What
Ben Aveling writes:
> On 12/01/2013 10:54 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Antoine Pelisse writes:
>>
>>> I would simply go for:
>>>
>>>What Message-ID are you replying to (if any)?
>>>
>>> If I don't know what to answer, I would definitely not say y/yes/n/no,
>>> but press enter directly.
>> So
On 12/01/2013 10:54 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Antoine Pelisse writes:
I would simply go for:
What Message-ID are you replying to (if any)?
If I don't know what to answer, I would definitely not say y/yes/n/no,
but press enter directly.
Sounds sensible (even though technically you reply t
Antoine Pelisse writes:
> I would simply go for:
>
> What Message-ID are you replying to (if any)?
>
> If I don't know what to answer, I would definitely not say y/yes/n/no,
> but press enter directly.
Sounds sensible (even though technically you reply to a message
that has that message ID, an
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The exchange, when you do not have a configuration, goes like this:
>
> $ git send-email 0001-filename-of-the-patch.patch
> 0001-filename-of-the-patch.patch
> Who should the emails be sent to (if any)? junio
> Are you sure y
Antoine Pelisse writes:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:13:57PM +, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>>
>>> > > How about "What Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
>>> > > or "Provide the Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for th
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:13:57PM +, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>
>> > > How about "What Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
>> > > or "Provide the Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first
>> > > email:".
>> >
>>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:13:57PM +, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
> > > How about "What Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
> > > or "Provide the Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first
> > > email:".
> >
> > seem fine to me. Maybe somebody who has been confused by
"Jeff King" wrote in message
news:<2013085417.ga12...@sigill.intra.peff.net>...
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:43:39AM -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>
>
> > How about "What Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
> > or "Provide the Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:43:39AM -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> > People answer 'y' to "Who should the emails appear to be from?" and
> > 'n' to "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
> > for some unknown reason. While it is possible that your local
> > username re
On 11 January 2013 08:47, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:39:06AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> > Please don't answer "y" when git send email shows the following prompt:
>> >
>> > "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
>> >
>> > you should respond with a message
On 01/11/2013 09:47 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:39:06AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>>> Please don't answer "y" when git send email shows the following prompt:
>>>
>>
>> Anyone willing to patch upstream 'git send-email' to reject a simple 'y'
> What version of git? Commit 51
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:39:06AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Please don't answer "y" when git send email shows the following prompt:
> >
> > "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
> >
> > you should respond with a message ID there. Unfortunately we have a
> > growing thre
[raising this UI wart to the git list]
On 01/11/2013 01:42 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 01/11/13 07:31, Chunyan Liu wrote:
>> This patch series is to...
[snip]
>
> Please don't answer "y" when git send email shows the following prompt:
>
> "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first ema
14 matches
Mail list logo