9 Feb 2017 21:53:52
>> +0100" but it appears that there was no mail sent to the Git mailing list
>
> I think this is this one:
>
>
>
> Recent "What's cooking" lists the topic this one is part with this
> comment:
>
> The tip one is newer than
was only one commit in that commit range:
>
> 3c0cb0c (read_loose_refs(): read refs using resolve_ref_recursively(),
> Michael Haggerty 2017-02-09)
>
> This one was committed with an author date "Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:53:52
> +0100" but it appears that there was no
mitted with an author date "Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:53:52
+0100" but it appears that there was no mail sent to the Git mailing list
with that particular Date: header and the *actual* mail containing the
patch was sent with a Date: header "Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:16:19 +0100"
(Message-ID:
d
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> > E.g.
>> >
>> > $ git show --notes=amlog --stat
>>
>> That's super useful! Thanks for the pointer!
>> Wouldn't it make sense to push these notes to github.com/git/git ?
>
> I am not quite sure about that. It is in a different namespace than what
> is usually clon
Hi Lars,
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Lars Schneider wrote:
> > On 06 Feb 2017, at 20:10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > Johannes Schindelin writes:
> >
> >> So I thought maybe the From: line (from the body, if available,
> >> otherwise from the header) in conjunction with the "Date:" header
> >> would
> On 06 Feb 2017, at 20:10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
>> So I thought maybe the From: line (from the body, if available, otherwise
>> from the header) in conjunction with the "Date:" header would work.
>
> FYI, I use a post-applypatch hook to populate refs/notes/
Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:48:20PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
>
> > I haven't hit insurmountable performance problems, even on
> > low-end hardware; especially since I started storing blob ids in
> > Xapian itself, avoiding the expensive tree lookup via git.
>
> The painful thing
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:48:20PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> I haven't hit insurmountable performance problems, even on
> low-end hardware; especially since I started storing blob ids in
> Xapian itself, avoiding the expensive tree lookup via git.
The painful thing is traversing the object graph
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> For details, see:
> http://public-inbox.org/git/11340844841342-git-send-email-mailing-lists@rawuncut.elitemail.org/
> (this is also an example where public-inbox' thread detection went utterly
> wrong, including way too many mails in the "thread")
Thanks, it shoul
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> So I thought maybe the From: line (from the body, if available, otherwise
> from the header) in conjunction with the "Date:" header would work.
FYI, I use a post-applypatch hook to populate refs/notes/amlog notes
tree when I queue a new patch; I am not sure how well
combinations in
the Git mailing list archive that are not unique. 71 of these are shared
by three or more mails, even, and 9 are shared by more than 10 mails,
respectively. This is bad!
Unsurprisingly, the top 10 of these cases were obviously caused by the
builtin `git am` bug where it would not r
I have been working on the builtin difftool for a while now, for two
reasons:
1. Perl is really not native on Windows. Not only is there a performance
penalty to be paid just for running Perl scripts, we also have to deal
with the fact that users may have different Perl installations, with
I have been working on the builtin difftool for almost two weeks,
for two reasons:
1. Perl is really not native on Windows. Not only is there a performance
penalty to be paid just for running Perl scripts, we also have to deal
with the fact that users may have different Perl installations, w
I have been working on the builtin difftool for almost two weeks,
for two reasons:
1. Perl is really not native on Windows. Not only is there a performance
penalty to be paid just for running Perl scripts, we also have to deal
with the fact that users may have different Perl installations, w
I have been working on the builtin difftool for a little over a week,
for two reasons:
1. Perl is really not native on Windows. Not only is there a performance
penalty to be paid just for running Perl scripts, we also have to deal
with the fact that users may have different Perl installation
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:12:45PM -0800, Kyle J. McKay wrote:
> And I responded and that response and the rest of the thread are available
> on gmane [1], but the first two messages are not. I waited 10 days just to
> make sure there were no bounce emails or undeliverable notifications coming
>
"Kyle J. McKay" writes:
> About 10 days ago I sent out this message (just reproducing the
> relevant headers here):
>
>> From: Kyle J. McKay
>> Date: February 24, 2015 09:16:05 PST
>> To: Junio C Hamano
>> Cc: Git Mailing List
>> Subject: A
About 10 days ago I sent out this message (just reproducing the
relevant headers here):
From: Kyle J. McKay
Date: February 24, 2015 09:16:05 PST
To: Junio C Hamano
Cc: Git Mailing List
Subject: Any chance for a Git v2.1.5 release?
Message-Id:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
--
Cheers,
Huajian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
20 matches
Mail list logo
